A Pennsylvania Moviegoer Has Sued AMC Over the Convenience Fee. Here Is Why It Had to Be Pennsylvania: the Federal Junk-Fee Rule Says in So Many Words That Film Screenings Are Not Live Events. And Every Cinema Fee Settlement You Can Actually Claim From Has Already Closed.
Late in August 2026 a class action was filed in a Pennsylvania state court against AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. over the mandatory “Convenience Fee” that appears late in the online ticket flow — avoidable only by paying $17.99 a year to join AMC Stubs Premiere. There is no settlement, no claim form and nothing to file. What makes the case worth understanding is the gap it sits in. The FTC's fee rule has been in force since May 2025, but it covers live-event tickets and short-term lodging, and the FTC's own guidance says film screenings are not live events. Pennsylvania's own junk-fee bill passed the House in June 2025 and has sat in a Senate committee ever since. So this plaintiff is suing without the statute that produced millions in settlements from AMC, Regal and Fandango in New York. We also could not obtain the docket number, and we say so rather than print one.
By Settlement Insight Data Desk ·

What we can confirm, and what we cannot
We would rather publish a short verified list than a long plausible one. The docket for this case is not in the free federal mirror because it is a state filing; the trade report that broke it puts the complaint behind a paywall; and the county register that would settle it requires an account. We searched the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas ourselves for both AMC entity names and ruled that county out. Allegheny County we could not search.
| Status | |
|---|---|
| Defendant named in the report | AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. |
| Court | A Pennsylvania state court — instance and county not reported |
| Filed | Late August 2026, reported August 28 |
| The fee | A mandatory “Convenience Fee” added late in the online purchase flow |
| The only way to avoid it | $17.99 a year for AMC Stubs Premiere |
| Relief sought | Damages, refunds of the fees, an injunction against the practice |
| Case caption and number | Not obtainable from free sources |
| Plaintiff's name and firm | Not confirmed |
| Amount of the fee in this case | Not stated in any accessible source |
| Statute relied on | Not stated. Pennsylvania's consumer protection law is the obvious candidate, but we have not seen the complaint and will not assert it |
Be careful with the numbers circulating for this case. The figures of about $2 to $3 a ticket, and $2.19 specifically, come from the New York AMC case of 2024. They are not this case's numbers.
The complaint describes the mechanism this way, as quoted in the only free account of it: AMC “displays a price for each ticket at the beginning of the purchase flow,” and later “adds a ‘Convenience Fee,’ which is mandatory unless a consumer instead elects to pay an annual $17.99 fee to join.”
Why Pennsylvania, and why now
This is the part that explains the case. There are two ways an American consumer normally attacks a drip-priced fee, and in Pennsylvania both are unavailable.
The federal rule does not reach cinema tickets
The FTC's Trade Regulation Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees, 16 C.F.R. Part 464, was published at 90 Fed. Reg. 2194 on January 10, 2025 and took effect on May 12, 2025. It requires the total price up front. It also has a narrow scope: live-event tickets and short-term lodging. The FTC's own guidance is explicit about where cinemas fall: “In general, pre-recorded audio and visual performances and film screenings are not live events covered by the Rule.”
A concert ticket is covered. The film you watch afterwards is not.
Pennsylvania has no law of its own — it came close
House Bill 1216, the “Pay the Price You See” junk-fee transparency bill, passed the Pennsylvania House of Representatives on June 23, 2025 by 108 votes to 95. It has been in the Senate consumer protection committee ever since. Had it become law, this plaintiff would have had a statute that says the advertised price must be the price.
Fifteen months of a stalled bill is the whole reason this is a novel case rather than a routine one — and why its outcome is genuinely uncertain in a way the New York cases never were.
Where the price you see is already the law
| State | In force since |
|---|---|
| Tennessee | 2023 |
| California — SB 478, Civ. Code § 1770(a)(29) | July 1, 2024 |
| Maryland (ticketing) | 2024 |
| Minnesota | January 1, 2025 |
| Virginia — Va. Code § 59.1-607 | July 1, 2025 |
| Massachusetts — 940 CMR 38.00 | September 2, 2025 |
| Colorado — C.R.S. § 6-1-737 | January 1, 2026 |
| Connecticut — P.A. 25-44 | July 1, 2026 |
New York is the outlier that matters here: its cinema cases were not brought under a junk-fee law at all, but under the Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 25.07(4), which has been on the books for years. New York's broader Junk Fee Prevention Act passed the Senate in May 2026 and remains in an Assembly committee — it is not law.
The complaint reportedly makes the point directly: where a state requires it, AMC shows the all-in price from the start. The practice changes with the jurisdiction.
Every cinema fee settlement you could have claimed from is closed
If you are here because you paid one of these fees and want money back, this table is the honest answer. All of these were real, all of them paid out, and all of their deadlines have passed.
| Case | Amount | Claim deadline | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Awad v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Index No. 607322/2024, Sup. Ct. Nassau County, N.Y. | $2 million; the fee at issue was $2.19 a ticket | November 8, 2024 | Closed — final approval November 26, 2024 |
| Jones v. Regal Cinemas, No. 1:23-cv-11145 (S.D.N.Y.) | $2.5 million | April 21, 2025 | Closed — final approval March 6, 2025 |
| Fandango, New York | $9 million | — | Closed, 2025 |
| Fandango, nationwide | $9.4 million | August 17, 2026 | Closed — final approval August 7, 2026 |
| Picciotti v. AMC, No. 1:24-cv-00110 (S.D.N.Y.) | — | — | Withdrawn by the plaintiff, April 26, 2024 |
The Fandango nationwide deadline passed eighteen days ago. If you are searching now, that is the one you most likely just missed — and it is worth knowing that a missed deadline does not merely cost you the payment; the release binds you anyway.
One older AMC headline still circulates and misleads: “AMC Theatres Customer Withdraws Suit Over Hidden Ticket Fees” is from April 2024 and belongs to Picciotti, not to this case.
A second AMC case, and why we are not describing it
Rodriguez v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., No. 3:26-cv-01825, was filed in the District of Oregon on September 1, 2026. The docket classifies it as diversity fraud, nature of suit 370, with a jury demanded.
That is all we know. The complaint was not retrievable and no reporting on it exists yet. It may be about ticket fees, or about something else entirely. We are listing it because a reader tracking AMC litigation should know it exists, and not describing it because we have not read it.
What to do about the fee itself
Nothing to file, no case to join, no deadline. But the fee is avoidable today, which is more than a lawsuit will offer for years:
- Buy at the box office. The convenience fee is attached to the online and app purchase path. Buying in person is the one reliable way around it without paying a membership.
- Do the membership arithmetic honestly. $17.99 a year pays for itself only above a certain number of online purchases; below that, the “free” way to avoid the fee costs more than the fee.
- Screenshot the checkout if you want to be useful to a future case. The claim in every one of these lawsuits turns on what the first screen showed versus what the last screen charged, and that evidence disappears the moment you close the tab.
- If you live in one of the states listed above, the all-in price is already legally required — a fee revealed only at the end may be worth reporting to your state attorney general rather than waiting for a class action.
We will update this page if the docket number surfaces or AMC responds.
The Data Behind This Story
- Defendant
- AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.
- Court
- A Pennsylvania state court — county not reported
- Filed
- Late August 2026
- Case number
- Not obtainable from free sources — we do not print one
- The fee
- Mandatory “Convenience Fee” added late in the online flow
- Only way to avoid it
- $17.99 a year — AMC Stubs Premiere
- Claim form
- None — this is a newly filed complaint
- FTC fee rule
- 16 C.F.R. Part 464, in force May 12, 2025 — excludes film screenings
- Pennsylvania junk-fee bill
- HB 1216 — passed the House 108–95 on June 23, 2025; stalled in Senate committee
- Earlier AMC settlement
- Awad, $2M, claim deadline November 8, 2024 — closed
- Most recently closed
- Fandango nationwide, $9.4M, claim deadline August 17, 2026
- Source: Law360, “AMC hit with class action over hidden convenience fees,” August 28, 2026, read in the freely available portion on September 4, 2026 — the identification of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. as defendant and the filing in a Pennsylvania state court. The attached complaint is behind the paywall and we did not obtain it.
- Source: Kelley Drye Ad Law Access, “AMC faces class action over hidden convenience fees,” September 1, 2026, read September 4, 2026 — the verbatim description of the purchase flow, the mandatory nature of the Convenience Fee, the $17.99 AMC Stubs Premiere alternative, the relief sought, and the timing “last week.”
- Source: Own docket searches, September 4, 2026 — CourtListener/RECAP returned no AMC case filed since August 1, 2026 in the Eastern, Middle or Western Districts of Pennsylvania, which is consistent with a state filing. A party-name search of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas civil docket for “AMC” and “American Multi-Cinema” returned only an unrelated premises-liability case, ruling that county out. The Allegheny County register requires a registered account and could not be searched.
- Source: FTC Trade Regulation Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees, 16 C.F.R. Part 464, 90 Fed. Reg. 2194 (January 10, 2025), the FTC announcement of its May 12, 2025 effective date, and the FTC's own frequently asked questions, all read September 4, 2026 — including the statement that pre-recorded performances and film screenings are generally not live events covered by the rule.
- Source: Pennsylvania General Assembly record for House Bill 1216, read September 4, 2026 — the June 23, 2025 House passage by 108 votes to 95 and its referral to the Senate consumer protection committee, where it remains.
- Source: State all-in pricing statutes as cited, read September 4, 2026: Cal. Civ. Code § 1770(a)(29) (SB 478, effective July 1, 2024); Va. Code § 59.1-607 (July 1, 2025); 940 CMR 38.00 (September 2, 2025); C.R.S. § 6-1-737 (January 1, 2026); Connecticut P.A. 25-44 (July 1, 2026); and New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 25.07(4), the basis of the New York cinema cases. New York Senate Bill S363, the Junk Fee Prevention Act, passed the Senate on May 12, 2026 and remains in an Assembly committee.
- Source: Records of the earlier cinema fee cases, read September 4, 2026 — Awad v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Index No. 607322/2024 (Sup. Ct. Nassau County), $2 million, $2.19 per ticket, claim deadline November 8, 2024, final approval November 26, 2024; Jones v. Regal Cinemas, No. 1:23-cv-11145 (S.D.N.Y.), $2.5 million, final approval March 6, 2025, claim deadline April 21, 2025; the two Fandango settlements of $9 million and $9.4 million, the latter finally approved August 7, 2026 with an August 17, 2026 claim deadline; and Picciotti v. AMC, No. 1:24-cv-00110 (S.D.N.Y.), withdrawn April 26, 2024.
- Source: Docket entry for Rodriguez v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., No. 3:26-cv-01825 (D. Or., filed September 1, 2026) via CourtListener, read September 4, 2026 — filing date, cause of action and nature of suit only. The complaint was not retrievable and we make no claim about its subject matter.
Journalists: these figures are free to cite with attribution to Settlement Insight. Custom data pulls: press@settlementinsight.com.