NextEra Energy’s $150 Million Investor Settlement Is Coming Back to the Judge — Lawyers Said on October 9, 2026 a Renewed Approval Bid Is on the Way. There Is Still No Claim Form, and the Separate $15.5 Million Deal Pays the Company, Not You.
Does this affect you?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
Jastram v. NextEra Energy, Inc., Case No. 9:23-cv-80833-AMC, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Judge Aileen M. Cannon. NextEra agreed to pay $150 million, covered by insurance, to settle claims by investors who bought NextEra securities between December 2, 2021 and February 1, 2023. Judge Cannon refused to preliminarily approve the deal on August 7, 2026, saying the papers did not show how many investors are in the class, how damages were calculated or what each investor would get against a $37.5 million fee request. On October 9, 2026, the two Florida pension funds leading the case told the court they will file a “Renewed Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval” and asked for a 30-page brief to answer every point. NextEra does not oppose. As of October 19, 2026, no claim form, claims administrator or filing deadline exists. The separate $15.5 million shareholder derivative settlement in Palm Beach County goes to NextEra itself; its objection deadline is November 30, 2026 and its hearing is December 14, 2026.
By Settlement Insight Data Desk ·

The short answer: no payment and no claim form for now — but the $150 million deal is still alive
If you bought NextEra Energy stock, bonds or options between December 2, 2021 and February 1, 2023, the money that could one day reach you is the $150 million securities class settlement in Jastram v. NextEra Energy. It is not approved. Judge Aileen M. Cannon denied preliminary approval on August 7, 2026 — “without prejudice,” which means the parties may try again — and on October 9, 2026 the lead plaintiffs said in writing that they will. Their filing describes a “forthcoming Renewed Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,” and says they “have undertaken substantial additional efforts to address each of the issues raised in the Order.”
That is a step forward, not a payout. Until the judge grants preliminary approval there is no court-approved notice, no claims administrator, no claim form and no deadline. Nothing you do today changes your position. The headline-grabbing $15.5 million NextEra Energy settlement, whose notice NextEra published on October 6, 2026, is a different case, and NextEra’s own notice says of it: “THIS IS NOT A ‘CLASS ACTION.’ THUS, THERE IS NO COMMON FUND UPON WHICH YOU CAN MAKE A CLAIM FOR MONETARY PAYMENT.”
What changed on October 9, 2026
The new filing is short — three pages, docket entry 142 — but it tells investors where the case is going. The lead plaintiffs, the City of Hollywood Police Officers’ Retirement System and the Pembroke Pines Firefighters & Police Officers Pension Fund, represented by Block & Leviton LLP, asked for 10 extra pages so their brief can run to 30 pages instead of the 20 the local rules allow. The reason, in their words: the extra space is “necessary to fully address each of the specific issues raised by the Court in the August 7, 2026 Order.” The certificate of conferral states that NextEra and the other defendants “do not oppose the relief sought.”
The docket shows the clerk set responses for October 23, 2026, and lists an order on the motion entered October 13, 2026. We could not read that order’s text, so we do not know whether it set a date for the renewed motion. As of October 19, 2026, the renewed motion itself had not appeared on the public docket index we checked. When it is filed, the judge can decide it on the papers or hold another hearing, as she did on July 30, 2026, before ruling on the first attempt.
What the judge wants to see before investors can file
Judge Cannon’s seven-page order of August 7, 2026 is the checklist the renewed motion has to meet. Her core finding: “much remains to be developed and established, particularly as relates to the size of the putative class (currently unknown), Plaintiff’s damage theories/calculations as superficially addressed in the Motion, and the projected benefits to class members.” The motion had called the class size unknown while citing “at least 200,000” members estimated by the claims administrator “in some unknown manner.” The judge also noted that no formal discovery appears to have been conducted.
The numbers she questioned are the closest thing to a payout estimate on the record. The proposed notice estimated a gross average recovery of about $0.28 per eligible share of common stock, while reporting $3.29 in average damages per common share. At the July 30 hearing, class counsel put per-share damage at $8.70, the stock price drop after a NextEra disclosure on January 25, 2023. Preferred stock was set at $.01 per share and bonds at $.03; for options, the order says, “no information provided.” Those figures come from the rejected proposal and may change.
On fees, class counsel planned to seek 25%, or $37.5 million, plus costs. The judge made “no finding that the Settlement is collusive” or that the fee is excessive, but wants itemized time records before any final approval. She also ordered changes that matter to investors: notice by both mail and email where available, at least 90 days (instead of 14) to read the final approval papers and object or opt out, and objections sent to the claims administrator rather than to the court clerk. A proposed payment of up to $15,000 to the lead plaintiffs must comply with the Eleventh Circuit’s ban on incentive awards, and the planned leftover-money gift to the Investor Rights Clinic of the University of Miami School of Law needs more support.
Who would be covered, and what to do now
The stipulation, as quoted in the August 7 order, defines the class as “all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired NEE Securities, including purchasers of NEE call options and sellers of NEE put options, during the period from December 2, 2021, through February 1, 2023, inclusive … and who were damaged thereby.” NextEra’s quarterly report for the period ended June 30, 2026 gives the end of the alleged class period as January 30, 2023; if the renewed motion is approved, the court-approved notice will settle which date applies. According to the same report, the $150 million includes plaintiffs’ lawyers’ fees and administration costs, and “NEE’s payment would be covered by insurance.”
What you can usefully do today: find your brokerage statements or trade confirmations for NextEra purchases and sales from December 2021 through early 2023, including any shares held in an IRA or a fund account you control. Securities settlements are paid on the trades you can document. You do not need a lawyer to claim, and there is no form to send. If preliminary approval is granted, the judge’s own order requires at least 90 days for objections and opt-outs after the final approval papers are filed, so there will be a defined window. We will report the claim deadline once the court sets one.
Real or a scam: how to tell
As of October 19, 2026, no court has approved a notice or a claims website for the $150 million NextEra securities settlement, because preliminary approval was denied and the renewed motion has not been decided. Any email, text or social-media post asking you to “claim your NextEra payout” now, pay a fee or hand over your brokerage login is not a court-approved notice. Under Judge Cannon’s order, the real notice will come by mail and email, name the case (Jastram v. NextEra Energy, Inc., No. 9:23-cv-80833) and point to a claims administrator.
For the $15.5 million derivative deal, the genuine notice is the one NextEra filed with the SEC and published on its newsroom on October 6, 2026. It asks for nothing and promises nothing to individual shareholders. For the separate $8,000,000 401(k) settlement, the settlement website is NextEraERISASettlement.com, and its notice says “No action is necessary to receive a payment.”
What is the NextEra Energy scandal, and which NextEra Energy settlement is yours?
What is the NextEra Energy scandal? The investor suits grew out of allegations about political activity in Florida. NextEra’s quarterly report describes the securities case as seeking damages for “alleged false or misleading statements regarding NEE’s alleged campaign finance and other political activities.” Utility Dive reported that the allegations include “using a political consulting firm to fund ‘ghost’ candidates to defeat state lawmakers deemed a threat to Florida Power & Light and spying on a reporter.” These are allegations; NextEra has not admitted wrongdoing. The suit was dismissed in September 2024, reinstated by the 11th Circuit in November 2025, and settled in June 2026.
Four separate tracks now carry the same company name. The $150 million securities class settlement is the only one that would pay investors directly, and it awaits a renewed motion. The $15.5 million derivative settlement (Davidson v. Silagy, No. 50-2023-CA-012434-XXXX-MB, Judge Carolyn Bell, Palm Beach County) pays NextEra itself through its directors’ and officers’ insurers, adds governance reforms for at least four years, and carries up to $5.75 million in lawyers’ fees; shareholders as of June 11, 2026 may object by November 30, 2026, and the in-person hearing is December 14, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. The $8,000,000 401(k) case, Stewart v. NextEra Energy, covers plan participants; its final approval hearing was scheduled for September 18, 2026, and the official site’s home page, read October 19, 2026, does not mention a final approval order.
What is NextEra paying for Dominion Energy? That is a separate corporate deal, not a settlement: Utility Dive reported that NextEra and Dominion Energy plan to merge in a $67 billion deal. Nothing in this article affects it, and questions about it belong with the companies’ investor-relations offices and the state utility regulators reviewing it.
The Data Behind This Story
- Case
- Jastram v. NextEra Energy, Inc., No. 9:23-cv-80833-AMC (securities class action)
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Judge Aileen M. Cannon
- Settlement
- $150 million, inclusive of fees and administration costs, covered by insurance — not approved
- Class
- Buyers of NextEra securities, including call-option buyers and put-option sellers, December 2, 2021 – February 1, 2023 (stipulation); 10-Q gives January 30, 2023
- Status
- Preliminary approval denied without prejudice August 7, 2026; renewed motion announced October 9, 2026, unopposed; order on page-limit motion October 13, 2026
- Claim form
- None as of October 19, 2026 — no administrator, no deadline
- Estimate in rejected notice
- About $0.28 per eligible common share gross; $3.29 average damages per share; preferred $.01, bonds $.03
- Fee request
- 25% or $37.5 million plus costs (anticipated); up to $15,000 proposed for lead plaintiffs
- Court-ordered changes
- Mail and email notice; at least 90 days to object or opt out; objections through the claims administrator
- Class size
- At least 200,000 (administrator estimate the court found unsupported)
- Derivative deal
- Davidson v. Silagy, Palm Beach County: $15.5 million to NextEra itself; objections by November 30, 2026; hearing December 14, 2026, 3:00 p.m.
- 401(k) deal
- Stewart v. NextEra Energy, $8,000,000; final approval hearing was set for September 18, 2026; no claim needed
- Source: Lead Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation, ECF No. 142, filed October 9, 2026, via CourtListener RECAP (PDF), read October 19, 2026: forthcoming Renewed Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval, 30-page request, issues raised in the August 7 order, defendants do not oppose, lead plaintiffs and counsel
- Source: CourtListener RECAP docket index for Jastram v. NextEra Energy, Inc., No. 9:23-cv-80833 (S.D. Fla.), read October 19, 2026: October 13, 2026 order on the motion, responses due October 23, 2026, July 30, 2026 hearing minute entry, ECF No. 137 entry; local CM/ECF feed read October 19, 2026 confirming the October 9 and October 13 entries
- Source: Order Following Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement; Denying Motion Without Prejudice; and Authorizing Refiling, Judge Aileen M. Cannon, August 7, 2026, ECF No. 137 (PDF), read October 19, 2026: grounds for denial, class definition, 200,000 estimate, $0.28/$3.29/$8.70 per-share figures, preferred and bond figures, $37.5 million fee, $15,000 lead plaintiff payment, cy pres recipient, notice, 90-day and objection requirements
- Source: NextEra Energy Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (SEC EDGAR), read October 19, 2026: case history (June 2023 filing, September 2024 dismissal, November 2025 reversal), $150 million inclusive of fees and costs, insurance coverage, 10-Q class period
- Source: Utility Dive, “NextEra to pay $150M to settle charges related to Florida political misconduct allegations,” June 17, 2026, read October 19, 2026: “ghost” candidate and reporter-surveillance allegations, $67 billion NextEra–Dominion merger plan
- Source: E&E News (POLITICO), “Judge denies proposed settlement between NextEra Energy, Florida investors,” August 11, 2026, read October 19, 2026: refiling allowed, more fact-finding required
- Source: NextEra Energy newsroom, “Summary Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Derivative Actions,” October 6, 2026, read October 19, 2026: not-a-class-action language, $15.5 million to NEE, four-year reforms, June 11, 2026 record date, November 30, 2026 objection deadline, December 14, 2026 hearing before Judge Carolyn Bell
- Source: Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Derivative Actions, Exhibit 99.1 to NextEra Energy Form 8-K (SEC EDGAR), read October 19, 2026: $5.75 million fee and expense amount, $5,000 service awards, “dark money” allegations
- Source: NextEraERISASettlement.com home page, read October 19, 2026: Stewart v. NextEra Energy, No. 9:23-cv-81314-AMC, $8,000,000, September 18, 2026 hearing notice, no action needed to receive payment; no final approval order mentioned
Journalists: these figures are free to cite with attribution to Settlement Insight. Custom data pulls: press@settlementinsight.com.