Smile More v. American Eagle: The 2026 Trademark Lawsuit
Active Litigation
The smile more lawsuit in the news is a brand-owner fight, not a consumer case. On September 25, 2026, Smile More Intellectual Holdings, LLC sued American Eagle Outfitters and The Smiley Company in federal court in Orlando for trademark infringement. Shoppers are not part of it. There is no settlement, no class and no claim form.
Questions about this case?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
Independent information service: Settlement Insight is not the settlement administrator, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any company named on this page, and is not a law firm. Submitting this form does not file a claim — it shares your information with our participating legal intake partners, who may contact you about your options.
What the Lawsuit Claims
The smile more american eagle lawsuit is titled Smile More Intellectual Holdings, LLC v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. et al. The court docket describes it as a complaint for trademark infringement and unauthorized use under the federal Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, with a jury demand. The second defendant is sued as The Smiley Company d/b/a The Smiley Company SPRL, also known as Smileyworld Limited.
Section 1125(a) targets the use of a word or symbol that is “likely to cause confusion” about who makes, sponsors or approves a product. In plain terms, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants used “Smile More” in a way that trades on its brand. These are allegations; no court has ruled on them.
We could not read the complaint itself, so we cannot confirm which products or designs it targets. Reports that it concerns apparel pairing “Smile More” with smiley-face graphics come from secondary summaries, not the filing.
Case details
The smile more federal lawsuit 2026 is No. 6:26-cv-02240 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando Division), filed September 25, 2026. On September 28, 2026 it was assigned to District Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Chauncey A. Bratt. Judge Byron signed an initial case-management order that day, and on September 30, 2026 Judge Bratt signed a standing order on discovery motions. The plaintiff is represented by Haynes Law Group, P.A. The docket is public on PacerMonitor.
The brand SMILE MORE is publicly tied to YouTube creator Roman Atwood. In 2018 the federal trademark board upheld his SMILE MORE registration for shirts, stickers and backpacks, finding the phrase points to him and his channel. The named plaintiff here is an LLC, not Atwood personally; the link between the two is widely reported but is not stated in any document we could open.
Status: Early Stage, Defendants Not Yet Responded (as of Oct. 21, 2026)
What comes next: under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, a defendant must answer within 21 days after being served, or within 60 days after a waiver request was sent (90 days if sent to a defendant outside the U.S.) if it timely waives service, unless the court extends the time or the defendant moves to dismiss instead. After that come a case-management report, discovery and possibly a summary-judgment fight. Trademark cases often end in a private settlement between the companies, but nothing like that has been reported here.
The plaintiff also filed a notice of pendency of other actions on October 15, 2026 and a related-action notice stating no related cases. If you were looking for the smilemore lawsuit about teeth aligners, that is a different company: see our SmileDirectClub lawsuit page.
Follow this case
There's no claim deadline yet. We'll email you when the case moves forward, like a settlement or payments going out.
Who Is Affected — Not Shoppers
No consumer is a party to this case. It is one company suing two others over a brand. It is not a class action, so there is no class to join and no notice will come to buyers.
If you bought American Eagle clothing, Smiley-branded goods or official Smile More merchandise, nothing about this lawsuit gives you a claim, a refund or a deadline. Returns and exchanges run through the store’s normal policy, not the court.
The people with a real stake are the plaintiff, the two defendants and any licensees whose products end up in dispute.
Is There Money for Consumers?
How cases like this one end
Our copy of the federal courts’ own case database covers 38,446 federal civil cases of this typeclosed in U.S. federal district courts between 2015 and 2026:
- 23.8% ended in a settlement recorded by the court. Another 28.5% were dismissed voluntarily, which often follows a private settlement — so the real settlement share sits between 23.8% and 52.3%.
- 4.1% were decided on a motion before any trial.
- 1 in 110 reached a trial (0.9%), after a median of 28.4 months.
- Median time from filing to the end of the case: 5.6 months.
- Only 2,917 of them (7.6%) record a money award at all; the median of those is $500,000.
These are base rates for this type of case (federal trademark cases) — not a prediction about this lawsuit, and not legal advice. Source: Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (civil), analysed by Settlement Insight. Cases heard in state courts are not included.
Smile More Trademark Timeline
November 28, 2018 — Trademark Board Sides With Atwood
In Cancellation No. 92062027 (not precedential), the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board refuses to cancel Roman Atwood’s SMILE MORE registration, finding he “actively and vigorously polices” the mark.
May 14, 2019 — An Earlier Federal Fight
Jerry Leigh of California, Inc. files a trademark case against Atwood in the Central District of California, No. 2:19-cv-04177. Its outcome is not covered on this page.
June 5, 2024 — A Registration Reportedly Lapses
One published case summary says a SMILE MORE registration for toy fidget spinners and toy animals was cancelled for a missed maintenance filing. We could not confirm this in the USPTO’s own system.
September 25, 2026 — The Lawsuit Is Filed
Smile More Intellectual Holdings, LLC sues American Eagle Outfitters and The Smiley Company in the Middle District of Florida, No. 6:26-cv-02240, with a jury demand.
September 28, 2026 — Judge Assigned
The case goes to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Chauncey A. Bratt; an initial case-management order issues the same day.
October 19, 2026 — American Eagle Served
Proof of service on American Eagle is filed. Its response comes next under Rule 12; service on The Smiley Company is not yet shown on the docket.
Three Things to Watch For
Search interest in the smile more lawsuit 2026 is high and the facts are thin — that combination attracts imposters:
“Smile More class action — claim your share”
There is no class and no settlement. Any page asking for your name, address or card details to “join” the American Eagle case is collecting data, not filing anything.
Refund or recall messages for Smiley merch
No court has ordered a recall or refund of any American Eagle or Smiley product. A text or email saying you are owed a refund because of the lawsuit, with a link to “verify your order,” is phishing.
Creator impersonators asking fans for help
Fan reports of Smile More knock-offs are part of this brand’s history, which makes fans easy targets. A DM from an account posing as the creator and asking for money for a “legal fund” or a paid “fan witness” sign-up is not how a federal lawsuit works.
Smile More Lawsuit — Questions People Actually Ask
Short answers to the questions people ask most about this case.
What is the Smile More American Eagle lawsuit?
A federal trademark case, Smile More Intellectual Holdings, LLC v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. et al, No. 6:26-cv-02240, filed September 25, 2026 in the Middle District of Florida. It alleges trademark infringement and unauthorized use under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 against American Eagle and The Smiley Company.
Is Roman Atwood suing American Eagle?
The plaintiff on the docket is Smile More Intellectual Holdings, LLC, not Atwood personally. The SMILE MORE brand is publicly associated with him, and the trademark board recognized him as the source of the mark in 2018, but the documents we could open do not state who owns the LLC.
Can you get sued for using a trademark?
Yes, if the use is likely to confuse buyers about who makes, sponsors or approves a product. That is the test in 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), the provision this case is brought under. Whether that happened here is exactly what the court will decide.
I bought Smile More or American Eagle merchandise. Am I owed money?
No. This is a dispute between companies over a brand. Buyers are not parties, there is no class and no claim form, and any recovery would go to the trademark owner.
How much money do you usually get from a class action lawsuit?
That question does not apply here, because this is not a class action. For real consumer settlements, our payout calculator explains how per-person amounts are worked out.
Is this the SmileDirectClub lawsuit?
No. SmileDirectClub was a teeth-aligner company with its own cases and actual payments to customers. If you searched for a smilemore lawsuit about aligners, see our SmileDirectClub page.
What happens next in the case?
Service on American Eagle was filed October 19, 2026. Under Rule 12 a defendant answers within 21 days of service (60 or 90 days if it timely waives service) unless the court extends the time or it files a motion to dismiss. As of October 21, 2026, the docket shows no return of service for The Smiley Company. Then discovery begins under the judge’s case-management order.
Wasn’t the Smile More trademark cancelled?
One published case summary reports that a SMILE MORE registration for toys, No. 5,340,817, was cancelled on June 5, 2024 after a required Section 8 filing was missed. That is not the clothing registration the trademark board upheld in 2018, and a lapsed registration does not by itself end a Lanham Act § 1125 claim. We could not verify either status in the USPTO’s own records.
About This Information
Editorially Reviewed — Content reviewed for accuracy using published legal research, government data, and verified court records. See our methodology. Reviewed by Leonard Goldberg, Editor · Last updated - $236 billion in real payouts analyzed · See what we found
This page is for general information only and is not legal advice. Lawsuit status, eligibility, and compensation can change. Settlement Insight is not a law firm and does not represent any party. Consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation.
Related Consumer Brand Lawsuits
Other cases and free tools — not about this case.
Similar cases we track
- Trademark Damages CalculatorHow Lanham Act damages and profits are actually calculated
- Open Class Action SettlementsSettlements you can actually file a claim in right now
- Settlement Payout CalculatorEstimate what a real class settlement pays per person
- SmileDirectClub LawsuitThe aligner case with real payments to customers