Nvidia Lawsuit: Which Case Is in the News, and Does Anyone Get Paid?
Questions about this case?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
There is no single Nvidia lawsuit. The one that matters most for ordinary people is the investor case over crypto-mining sales in 2017 and 2018: on March 25, 2026 a federal judge certified a class of everyone who bought Nvidia stock between August 10, 2017 and November 15, 2018. Separately, authors say Nvidia trained AI models on pirated books, and voice actors say it used their voices. As of October 2026 none of these has settled. There is no fund, no claim form and no deadline.
Editorially Reviewed — Content reviewed for accuracy using published legal research, government data, and verified court records. See our methodology
Reviewed by Leonard Goldberg, Editor · Last updated
What the Lawsuits Say Nvidia Did
Investors (the crypto case). The lawsuit alleges that Nvidia and its CEO made false or misleading statements about how much of its graphics-card growth came from cryptocurrency miners rather than gamers, between May 10, 2017 and November 14, 2018. When crypto demand collapsed, Nvidia on November 15, 2018 guided fourth-quarter revenue to $2.7 billion, a 7% year-over-year decline, citing a “sharp falloff in crypto demand,” and the stock fell. Nvidia denies the claims.
Authors (AI training). A group of book authors alleges that Nvidia used copies of their books from shadow libraries such as Anna’s Archive to build its Megatron family of language models.
Voices (biometric privacy). Illinois journalists, podcasters and voice actors allege that Nvidia, along with other tech companies, captured voiceprints from their recordings to train AI voice models without the written consent Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act requires.
Case Details
1. Investor class action. In re NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation, No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Filed December 21, 2018; the co-lead plaintiffs are a Swedish fund manager and a Dutch pension fund. Dismissed March 2, 2021; revived by the Ninth Circuit (No. 21-15604) on August 25, 2023; the Supreme Court took the case, then dismissed it as improvidently granted on December 11, 2024. Class certified March 25, 2026.
2. Shareholder derivative suits. Claims brought on Nvidia’s behalf against its officers and directors over the same crypto statements: No. 4:19-cv-00341-HSG (N.D. Cal., administratively closed since February 22, 2022), Lipchitz v. Huang (No. 1:19-cv-01795-MN) and Nelson v. Huang (No. 1:19-cv-01798-MN) in federal court in Delaware, and Horanic v. Huang (No. 2023-1096-KSJM) in the Delaware Court of Chancery. All wait on the investor case. Any recovery goes to the company, not to individual shareholders.
3. Authors’ copyright case. Nazemian v. NVIDIA Corp., No. 4:24-cv-01454-JST, Northern District of California, Judge Jon S. Tigar, filed March 9, 2024.
4. Voiceprint (BIPA) class action. Filed in May 2026 in the Northern District of Illinois as one of nine parallel suits against tech companies. We could not confirm its case number.
5. Patent suit. On September 29, 2026 a suit was filed in the Eastern District of Texas alleging that Nvidia data centers infringe five networking patents once held by Avaya. This is a business dispute; consumers are not part of it.
6. Government matters. In 2022 Nvidia paid the SEC a $5.5 million penalty over its crypto disclosures, without admitting or denying the findings (closed). In September 2025 China’s market regulator said a preliminary probe found Nvidia breached conditions attached to its $6.9 billion Mellanox purchase. In September 2026 news outlets reported that the U.S. Justice Department is examining Nvidia’s licensing deal with Groq; the DOJ has not confirmed it.
Status: Investor Class Certified, Nothing Payable
Investor case: class certified March 25, 2026 in a 50-page opinion finding Nvidia had not rebutted the “fraud on the market” presumption of classwide reliance; the case is in fact discovery. Certification is not a finding that Nvidia did anything wrong. In its quarterly report for the period ended July 26, 2026, Nvidia said it had accrued no liability because a loss, while reasonably possible, is not probable.
Authors’ case: on May 5, 2026 Judge Tigar denied most of Nvidia’s motion to dismiss, letting claims about Megatron 345M, BitTorrent downloading and contributory infringement proceed, and dismissed the vicarious-infringement claim with leave to amend.
Voice case: on September 25, 2026 the Illinois judge paused discovery until he rules on Nvidia’s motion to dismiss.
Follow this case
There's no claim deadline yet. We'll email you if a settlement opens a claim period.
Are You Affected?
Investors: the certified class is everyone who bought or otherwise acquired Nvidia common stock between August 10, 2017 and November 15, 2018, inclusive, minus Nvidia’s officers, directors, their immediate families and certain others. If you bought only after November 15, 2018, you are not in it. Keep your brokerage statements for that window: if there is ever a recovery, they are your proof of purchase price and quantity. A court-approved notice to class members explains any right to opt out; we could not confirm an opt-out deadline as of October 2026.
Gamers and graphics-card buyers: none of these cases is a consumer class for people who bought Nvidia cards. We found no open Nvidia consumer settlement.
Authors and voice professionals: the proposed classes cover rights holders whose books or recorded voices were allegedly used. No class has been certified in either case.
Is There Money? Not Yet
If the investor case eventually settles or wins at trial, money would go to class members in proportion to the shares they bought during the class period and the price drop attributed to the alleged fraud, after fees and costs. Securities settlements are usually paid per eligible share, not per person, so the size of your 2017–2018 position matters far more than anything else. No court has valued these claims, and Nvidia disputes liability.
How cases like this one end
Our copy of the federal courts’ own case database covers 16,553 federal civil cases of this typeclosed in U.S. federal district courts between 2015 and 2025, 27.2% of them filed as class actions:
- 8.9% ended in a settlement recorded by the court. Another 41.5% were dismissed voluntarily, which often follows a private settlement — so the real settlement share sits between 8.9% and 50.4%.
- 10% were decided on a motion before any trial.
- 1 in 153 reached a trial (0.7%), after a median of 37.4 months.
- Median time from filing to the end of the case: 4.5 months.
- Only 1,000 of them (6%) record a money award at all; the median of those is $1,072,500.
These are base rates for this type of case (federal securities cases) — not a prediction about this lawsuit, and not legal advice. Source: Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (civil), analysed by Settlement Insight. Cases heard in state courts are not included.
Nvidia Lawsuit Timeline
- 1
November 15, 2018 — The Crypto Warning
Nvidia guides fourth-quarter revenue to $2.7 billion, citing a sharp falloff in crypto demand. The investor suit follows on December 21, 2018.
- 2
May 6, 2022 — SEC Penalty
Nvidia settles SEC charges over its crypto disclosures and pays a $5.5 million penalty without admitting or denying the findings.
- 3
December 11, 2024 — Supreme Court Steps Back
After hearing argument, the Supreme Court dismisses Nvidia’s appeal as improvidently granted, leaving the Ninth Circuit’s revival of the investor case in place.
- 4
March 25, 2026 — Investor Class Certified
Judge Gilliam certifies a class of everyone who bought Nvidia stock from August 10, 2017 through November 15, 2018.
- 5
May 5, 2026 — Authors’ Case Survives
Judge Tigar lets most of the authors’ AI-training claims proceed. The same month, voice actors and journalists sue in Illinois.
- 6
September 2026 — New Fronts, No Settlement
The voice case is paused pending a dismissal ruling on September 25, a patent suit is filed in Texas on September 29, and the DOJ is reported to be examining the Groq deal.
Three Things to Watch For
A household-name company, a certified class and no claim form is a combination imposters like:
“Claim your Nvidia settlement payment”
There is no Nvidia settlement in any of these cases. A site or text asking for your brokerage login, Social Security number or a “processing fee” to release Nvidia money is not connected to any court.
“Recover your NVDA losses” for recent buyers
The certified class covers purchases from August 10, 2017 through November 15, 2018 only. Pitches telling recent buyers they can join the crypto case, or that Nvidia’s stock swings entitle them to money, misdescribe the case.
Fake GPU-owner refund offers
Graphics-card buyers are not a class in any of these suits. Emails promising a refund for your Nvidia card “from the lawsuit” are phishing. Real class notices name the court and the case number.
Nvidia Lawsuit — Questions People Actually Ask
What is the Nvidia lawsuit in the news?
Usually the investor class action over crypto-mining revenue, In re NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation, No. 4:18-cv-07669-HSG in the Northern District of California. Its latest major ruling was class certification on March 25, 2026. AI-related suits by authors and voice professionals also make headlines.
Is there an Nvidia settlement I can file a claim for?
No. As of October 2026 no Nvidia lawsuit has settled, and there is no claim form, fund, administrator or deadline. If that changes, class members are notified through a court-approved notice that names the case and the court.
I bought Nvidia stock. Am I in the class?
Only if you bought or acquired Nvidia common stock between August 10, 2017 and November 15, 2018, inclusive, and you are not one of the excluded insiders. Purchases outside that window are not covered.
Do I need to sign up to be included?
No. A certified Rule 23 class includes you unless you opt out under the terms of the court-approved notice. Keep your 2017–2018 trade records; that is what a claim would later require.
Did Nvidia already pay for the crypto issue?
Nvidia paid the SEC a $5.5 million penalty on May 6, 2022, without admitting or denying the findings. That money went to the government. The private investor case is separate and unresolved.
What is the authors’ case about?
Authors allege Nvidia trained Megatron language models on their books, taken from shadow libraries such as Anna’s Archive. On May 5, 2026 Judge Tigar let most claims proceed. For how other AI companies have fared, see our Anthropic lawsuit and OpenAI lawsuit pages.
I’m a gamer. Can I sue over my Nvidia graphics card?
None of the current cases is a consumer case for card buyers, and we found no open Nvidia consumer settlement. A product defect claim would be a separate matter for a lawyer to assess.
Is the DOJ suing Nvidia?
No lawsuit has been filed. In September 2026 news outlets reported a Justice Department antitrust inquiry into Nvidia’s Groq licensing deal; the DOJ has not confirmed it. An investigation is not a finding of wrongdoing and does not pay consumers.
Separate from this case: were you injured in the last 2 years?
Class-action payouts are fixed amounts through an administrator. A personal injury claim is a different case — and often worth far more. Free estimate, no obligation.
Related Consumer Brand Lawsuits
Open Class Action Settlements
Settlements currently accepting claims, with deadlines
OpenAI Lawsuit
The other big AI training-data fight, case by case
Copyright Damages Calculator
How statutory damages for infringement are figured
Settlement Payout Calculator
Estimate what a class member typically receives