Thinkware Settles “Super Night Vision” Dashcam Case for $850,000 — Buyers of Five Models From 2019 to 2024 Can Claim Until December 14, 2026, One Camera Without a Receipt
Does this affect you?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
Jessica Ratzak v. Thinkware Systems USA, Inc., Case No. S-CV-0049793, Superior Court of California, County of Placer; final approval hearing before Judge Trisha J. Hirashima. Thinkware Systems USA has agreed to a $850,000 fund for people in the United States who bought a Thinkware X700, F200PRO, DC-M2-FG-IR, DC-M2-FG or F70PRO dashcam between January 25, 2019 and August 31, 2024. The lawsuit alleges the cameras were sold as having “Super Night Vision” without disclosing that it worked only in parking mode; Thinkware denies it. The court granted preliminary approval on August 12, 2026. Claims are due December 14, 2026, exclusions and objections November 30, 2026, and the final approval hearing is January 12, 2027. Payments are pro rata and weighted by model; the settlement publishes no per-camera estimate. The official site is TWCameraSettlement.com, run by the court-appointed administrator EisnerAmper.
By Settlement Insight Data Desk ·

What the Thinkware settlement is, as of September 30, 2026
If you bought one of five Thinkware dashcam models in the United States between January 25, 2019 and August 31, 2024, you can file a claim in an $850,000 class action settlement. The deadline is December 14, 2026. Nobody is paid yet: the settlement still needs final approval at a hearing on January 12, 2027, and the official FAQ is blunt that “No money or benefits are available now” and that “There is no guarantee that money or benefits will ever be distributed.”
The case, Jessica Ratzak v. Thinkware Systems USA, Inc., was filed on January 25, 2023 in the Superior Court of California for Placer County under California’s false advertising, unfair competition and Consumer Legal Remedies laws. According to the official site, the lawsuit alleges that Thinkware “violated the law by misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its Thinkware X700, F200PRO, DC-M2-FG-IR, DC-M2-FG, and F70PRO dashcams (‘Class Products’) featured a ‘Super Night Vision’ function, but failing to disclose that the function was only available in parking mode.” The named plaintiff says in the complaint that after installing an F200 Pro, “the dropdown menu only allowed Plaintiff to use night vision in parking mode,” and that a Thinkware support agent told her the limitation was described on Best Buy’s and Thinkware’s websites. These are allegations. Thinkware “strongly denies any wrongdoing and does not believe it has any liability,” the FAQ says, and settled to avoid further litigation; no court ruled on the merits.
The parties mediated on June 19, 2024 before retired Judge Daniel Buckley and reached a settlement in principle on August 8, 2024. The motion for preliminary approval was filed with papers dated February 20, 2026, and the court granted it, unopposed, on August 12, 2026.
Which dashcams, and who is a class member
Only five models are covered: the X700, F200PRO, DC-M2-FG-IR, DC-M2-FG and F70PRO. Other Thinkware models are not in the class definition. The court-certified settlement class is “all persons within the United States who purchased” one of those cameras between January 25, 2019 and August 31, 2024; the official site phrases it as buying a class product “in the United States.” The definition does not limit where you bought it — the settlement called for subpoenas to “brick-and-mortar and online retailers who sold Products during the Class Periods” to find buyers. Excluded are members of the court, class counsel, and Thinkware and its employees and agents.
The settlement agreement says it was reached “with the understanding that approximately 62,029 Products were sold during the Class Period.” If confirmatory discovery shows more than 65,130 cameras — 3,101 above that figure — Thinkware adds $6.70 to the fund for each additional camera.
How much you could get: a weighted share, with no official estimate
The $850,000 is not all for buyers. Before anything is divided, the fund pays attorneys’ fees of up to one-third — class counsel will ask for no more than $283,333.33 — litigation costs of up to $20,000, a service award of up to $10,000 for the named plaintiff, and notice and administration costs the parties “anticipate” will not exceed $100,000. The agreement itself puts the remaining “Total Distributable Settlement Fund” at $436,666.67. The fund is non-reversionary, so unclaimed money does not go back to Thinkware; the official site says it goes to The Public Justice Foundation.
What each buyer receives depends on how many people claim and which models they claim. The agreement says claimants “will receive a weighted pro rata distribution of the Total Distributable Settlement Fund, depending on the number of claims made and the total number and distribution of Class Products claimed.” The FAQ refers readers to the agreement for how the weights are set, but the published 24-page agreement does not list a value for each model. There is no official per-camera estimate.
Our arithmetic gives the range. If every one of the roughly 62,029 cameras were claimed, $436,666.67 would come to about $7.04 per camera. Fewer claims mean a larger share: if one in ten cameras were claimed — about 6,200 — the share would be about $70. Actual amounts will differ by model and by the fees the court approves. Payment comes by paper check or digital payment (the claim form requires an email address for the digital option), and uncashed checks expire after 180 days.
How to file by December 14, 2026 — and what the one-camera rule means
You can file online through the “Submit a Claim” button on TWCameraSettlement.com, or print the claim form and mail it to Thinkware Claims Administrator, P.O. Box 1349, Baton Rouge, LA 70821. Online claims must be submitted, and mailed claims postmarked, by December 14, 2026.
The form asks for your name, mailing address, email, phone, a Settlement Claim ID if you received one in a notice, your payment choice, and for each camera the model, quantity, approximate purchase date, purchase location and serial number. If you did not get a Claim ID, the form asks you to “provide proof of purchase, purchase location, date, and serial number associated with your Thinkware DashCam.” The agreement is more lenient for a single camera: for buyers who were not notified directly, proof of purchase, location, date and serial number “will be optional,” but there is “a cap of 1 Class Product per Class Member” without proof of purchase, and those claims are “subject to fraud auditing.” To claim more than one camera you must include proof of purchase.
If you do nothing, you stay in the class, give up the right to sue Thinkware over the advertising, and receive no money. The release does not cover personal injury or product liability claims. Other settlements that pay without a receipt are collected on our no-proof-of-purchase list.
Opting out, objecting, and the January 12, 2027 hearing
To keep your right to sue Thinkware yourself, submit the opt-out form online or by mail, “submitted electronically or postmarked no later than Monday, November 30, 2026.” If you opt out you receive nothing and cannot object.
To object, you must stay in the class and send a written objection to the claims administrator by November 30, 2026. It must include the case name and number, your name, address and phone number, proof of purchase with locations and time frames, all grounds for the objection, whether you plan to attend the hearing, and a declaration listing any other class action objections you or your lawyer filed in the previous five years. To speak at the hearing, you or your lawyer must also file a notice of intention to appear with the court no later than 30 days before it.
The final approval hearing is set for January 12, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. Pacific in Department 32 of the Placer County Superior Court at the Hon. Howard G. Gibson Courthouse, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville, CA 95678, before Judge Trisha J. Hirashima; the case had been assigned to Judge Garen Horst, and the preliminary approval order moved the final hearing to Department 32. The date can change — the FAQ tells class members to check the settlement website. Class counsel is the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. in Calabasas, California, (323) 306-4234.
Is the Thinkware settlement email or postcard real?
Direct notice is part of the plan. The agreement had class counsel subpoena retailers for buyers’ contact details, send notice by email where an address was available, and send “a postcard” where only a mailing address was known. A genuine notice may carry a Settlement Claim ID, which saves you from having to prove your purchase.
Check any message against the official channels. The court-approved notice and claim form both name www.TWCameraSettlement.com, and that site says it “is the only authorized website for this litigation.” The settlement agreement had proposed a different address, DashCamSettlement.com; the site that went live and that the notice names is TWCameraSettlement.com. The administrator is EisnerAmper, appointed by the court as Eisner Advisory Group, LLC: toll-free 1-888-614-5272, info@TWCameraSettlement.com, P.O. Box 1349, Baton Rouge, LA 70821. The claim form asks for contact details, camera details and a payment choice; it does not ask for a Social Security number or a bank account number. Do not contact the court or Thinkware about the settlement; the FAQ says they cannot advise you.
What happens next
After the January 12, 2027 hearing, money moves only once the settlement reaches its “Effective Date” — final judgment plus the time for any appeal. Thinkware then has 30 days to pay the $850,000 to the administrator, and payments to claimants follow. No payment date has been announced. Until then, the useful dates are fixed: opt out or object by November 30, 2026, claim by December 14, 2026. More settlements with open deadlines are on our open class action settlements page.
The Data Behind This Story
- Case
- Jessica Ratzak v. Thinkware Systems USA, Inc., Case No. S-CV-0049793
- Court
- Superior Court of California, County of Placer; filed January 25, 2023; preliminary approval August 12, 2026; final hearing before Judge Trisha J. Hirashima
- Settlement fund
- $850,000, non-reversionary; distributable fund $436,666.67 per the agreement; plus $6.70 per camera if sales exceed 65,130
- Models
- Thinkware X700, F200PRO, DC-M2-FG-IR, DC-M2-FG, F70PRO
- Class
- Persons in the United States who bought a covered model January 25, 2019 – August 31, 2024; about 62,029 cameras sold
- Allegation
- “Super Night Vision” advertised without disclosing it worked only in parking mode; Thinkware denies wrongdoing
- Proof of purchase
- Optional for 1 camera if you were not notified directly (fraud audit); required for more than 1
- Payment
- Weighted pro rata by model and number of claims; paper check or digital payment; checks expire after 180 days; no official estimate
- Deadlines
- Claim by December 14, 2026; opt out or object by November 30, 2026
- Final approval hearing
- January 12, 2027, 8:30 a.m. PT, Department 32, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville, CA 95678
- Fees and costs
- Attorneys’ fees up to $283,333.33 (33.33%); costs up to $20,000; service award up to $10,000; administration expected at no more than $100,000
- Administrator
- EisnerAmper (Eisner Advisory Group, LLC) — TWCameraSettlement.com · 1-888-614-5272 · info@TWCameraSettlement.com · P.O. Box 1349, Baton Rouge, LA 70821
- Source: TWCameraSettlement.com — home page, FAQ 1–23, Court Documents and Contact pages, read September 30, 2026: case name and number, class products and class period, allegations and Thinkware’s denial, $850,000 fund and deductions, deadlines of November 30 and December 14, 2026, hearing on January 12, 2027 in Department 32, opt-out and objection requirements, cy pres to The Public Justice Foundation, contact details, “only authorized website”
- Source: Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims and Rights (24 pages, PDF on the official site), read September 30, 2026: class definition, EisnerAmper as administrator, 62,029 cameras and the $6.70 escalator above 65,130, $436,666.67 distributable fund, fee and cost caps, $100,000 administration estimate, retailer subpoenas and email/postcard notice, proposed DashCamSettlement.com URL, weighted pro rata claims with a one-camera cap without proof, check or electronic payment, 180-day check expiry, release carve-out for personal injury and product liability, filing date and mediation history
- Source: Claim Form (PDF), read September 30, 2026: December 14, 2026 postmark/online deadline, fields including Settlement Claim ID and payment option (paper check or digital payment with email), proof requirements without a Claim ID and for more than one camera
- Source: Notice of Ruling on the Motion for Preliminary Approval, served August 14, 2026 (PDF), read September 30, 2026: preliminary approval granted August 12, 2026, class certified for settlement, Eisner Advisory Group, LLC appointed, final hearing January 12, 2027 in Department 32 before Judge Trisha J. Hirashima, case assigned to Judge Garen Horst
- Source: Class Action Complaint, filed January 25, 2023 (PDF), read September 30, 2026: the named plaintiff’s allegations about night vision available only in parking mode and the support chat
- Source: Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval (PDF), read September 30, 2026: non-reversionary fund, about 62,029 products sold
- Source: Long-Form Notice (PDF), read September 30, 2026: claim online at www.TWCameraSettlement.com or by mail to P.O. Box 1349, Baton Rouge, LA 70821
Journalists: these figures are free to cite with attribution to Settlement Insight. Custom data pulls: press@settlementinsight.com.