Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit: Where Things Stand in 2026
Questions about this case?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
There is no open vaginal mesh settlement you can file a claim in. The federal mass litigation over transvaginal mesh — seven multidistrict cases against Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson), Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, Coloplast, Cook and Neomedic — is closed. What remains are individual injury lawsuits: Johnson & Johnson reported about 5,190 U.S. plaintiffs still pending as of December 28, 2025. If you had mesh implanted and have complications, the question is whether an individual case is still possible for you, not whether you missed a form.
Editorially Reviewed — Content reviewed for accuracy using published legal research, government data, and verified court records. See our methodology
Reviewed by Leonard Goldberg, Editor · Last updated
What the Lawsuits Say Happened
Transvaginal mesh is a synthetic implant placed through the vagina to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Tens of thousands of women sued its makers. The lawsuits allege the products were defectively designed and that the companies failed to warn patients and surgeons about complications. Plaintiffs plead design and manufacturing defects, failure to warn, breach of warranty, fraud and state consumer-protection violations.
The complications at the center of the cases are the ones state attorneys general later named in their own settlements: chronic pain and inflammation, mesh erosion through the vagina, new incontinence after surgery, painful sex and vaginal scarring. California alleged that Johnson & Johnson sold more than 470,000 pelvic mesh products nationally from 2008 to 2014, and that more than 2 million women worldwide received these products. The manufacturers have denied liability; Boston Scientific states its settlements were made “without any admission or concession” of wrongdoing.
Case Details
The federal cases were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia under Judge Joseph Goodwin, in one MDL per manufacturer: No. 2187 (C.R. Bard), 2325 (American Medical Systems), 2326 (Boston Scientific), 2327 (Ethicon), 2387 (Coloplast), 2440 (Cook Medical) and 2511 (Neomedic). Per Drugwatch, those MDLs closed between 2017 and 2021. Johnson & Johnson says the court entered an order closing the Ethicon MDL in March 2021 and sent remaining cases back to the courts where they were filed.
Separately, state attorneys general sued over marketing, not over individual injuries. California won a $343.99 million penalty judgment against Johnson & Johnson in San Diego Superior Court on January 30, 2020. After appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court declined on February 21, 2023 to review the resulting $302 million judgment, which California says is now final.
In state court, New Jersey runs two multicounty litigations: one for Ethicon’s Gynecare pelvic mesh and one for Bard. Per Drugwatch, the Bard docket is before Superior Court Judge Rachelle L. Harz, and a group of cases remains there as of Drugwatch’s October 2026 update.
Status: Federal Cases Closed, Individual Suits Continue
Litigation has not ended entirely. Johnson & Johnson’s annual report counts about 5,190 U.S. plaintiffs with pending pelvic mesh lawsuits as of December 28, 2025. Boston Scientific’s report for 2025, filed February 17, 2026, says it has resolved “the majority” of its mesh claims, keeps a reserve for the rest and continues to “vigorously contest” them. Both companies also face cases abroad, including in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada and Australia. Per Drugwatch, an April 2026 case management order shows hundreds of cases still on the New Jersey Ethicon docket.
Who Can Still Bring a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit
A vaginal mesh lawsuit today is an individual personal-injury case, not a class you join. The people with a potential claim generally share three facts: a transvaginal mesh or sling was implanted, they developed complications such as erosion, chronic pain or pain with sex, and those injuries are documented in medical records — often including revision or removal surgery.
Timing is the hard part. Every state sets its own filing deadline (statute of limitations), and it is often measured from when you knew or should have known the mesh caused your injury. Many older claims are already time-barred; others are not. Only a licensed attorney in your state can answer that for your dates.
If you already settled through one of the inventory deals, that release usually ends your claim against that manufacturer. Your operative report and implant sticker identify the product and maker — request them from the hospital if you do not have them.
What Vaginal Mesh Cases Have Paid
The state settlements — $116.86 million from Johnson & Johnson (41 states and D.C., 2019), $60 million from Bard (48 states and D.C., 2020) and $188.6 million from Boston Scientific (47 states and D.C., 2021) — went to the states and imposed marketing rules. None of them paid individual patients. Individual results depend on the injury, the number of surgeries and the state; past amounts are not a prediction for any new case.
How cases like this one end
Our copy of the federal courts’ own case database covers 627,540 product liability personal injury casesclosed in U.S. federal district courts between 2015 and 2025:
- 21.1% ended in a settlement recorded by the court. Another 51.6% were dismissed voluntarily, which often follows a private settlement — so the real settlement share sits between 21.1% and 72.6%.
- 0.9% were decided on a motion before any trial.
- 1 in 2,164 reached a trial (0%), after a median of 27.9 months.
- Median time from filing to the end of the case: 33.6 months.
- Only 147 of them (0%) record a money award at all; the median of those is $3,875,000.
These are base rates for this type of case (federal product liability personal injury cases) — not a prediction about this lawsuit, and not legal advice. Source: Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (civil), analysed by Settlement Insight. Cases heard in state courts are not included.
Transvaginal Mesh Litigation Timeline
- 1
April 16, 2019 — FDA Halts Prolapse Mesh Sales
The FDA orders all makers of mesh for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse — Boston Scientific and Coloplast — to stop selling. The products are withdrawn.
- 2
October 17, 2019 — J&J Pays 41 States
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon agree to pay $116.86 million to 41 states and D.C. over mesh marketing. The money goes to the states, not to patients.
- 3
January 30, 2020 — California Wins $343.99 Million
After a nine-week trial, a San Diego judge finds Johnson & Johnson engaged in false and deceptive marketing of pelvic mesh.
- 4
September 2020 to March 2021 — More State Deals, MDL Closes
Bard pays $60 million to 48 states and D.C.; Boston Scientific pays $188.6 million to 47 states and D.C. In March 2021 the Ethicon MDL is closed.
- 5
February 21, 2023 — $302 Million Judgment Final
The U.S. Supreme Court declines to review California’s $302 million judgment against Johnson & Johnson over pelvic mesh marketing.
- 6
December 28, 2025 — About 5,190 Plaintiffs Still Pending
Johnson & Johnson’s annual report counts about 5,190 U.S. plaintiffs with pending pelvic mesh suits. New Jersey state dockets remain active in 2026.
Three Things to Watch For
Years of TV ads and big headline numbers keep this topic attractive to people selling something:
“Claim your mesh settlement payment”
There is no vaginal mesh settlement fund or claim form open to the public. The multistate settlements paid states, not patients. A site or caller asking for your Social Security or Medicare number to “release your payment” is collecting data, not filing anything.
“You’re owed part of the $302 million”
California’s judgment was civil penalties paid to the state. No individual share exists, and no legitimate party charges a fee to send you one.
Pressure to have surgery for a bigger payout
Mesh removal is a medical decision for you and your own doctor. Be wary of anyone who links surgery to a “higher settlement tier” or steers you to a doctor they choose. Check any lawyer with your state bar before signing.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit — Questions People Actually Ask
Is there a vaginal mesh settlement I can file a claim for right now?
No. As of October 2026 there is no open class settlement, fund or claim form. Mesh cases were resolved one by one or in confidential group deals through plaintiffs’ law firms. You can browse settlements that are actually taking claims on our open settlements list.
Did the state attorney general settlements pay women with mesh?
No. The Johnson & Johnson ($116.86 million), Bard ($60 million) and Boston Scientific ($188.6 million) multistate settlements, and California’s $302 million judgment, went to the states and required the companies to disclose risks. They did not create a fund for patients.
Can I still file a vaginal mesh lawsuit in 2026?
Possibly. Individual suits are still pending and still being filed — Johnson & Johnson counted about 5,190 U.S. plaintiffs as of December 28, 2025. Whether you can sue depends on your state’s filing deadline and when you learned the mesh caused your injury. A licensed attorney can check your dates.
How much is a vaginal mesh settlement worth?
Most amounts are confidential. Reported group deals ranged widely — Coloplast’s 2014 settlement reportedly worked out to about $40,000 per claimant, while Bard paid $200 million for about 3,000 cases in 2015. Revision surgeries, permanent injury and the state where you sue drive the value. For how injury claims are generally valued, see the medical device lawsuit calculator.
Which companies made the transvaginal mesh in these lawsuits?
The seven federal MDLs named Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson), Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, Coloplast, Cook Medical and Neomedic. Your operative report or implant record shows which product you received.
Was vaginal mesh recalled?
On April 16, 2019 the FDA ordered the makers of mesh for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to stop selling it; Boston Scientific’s Uphold Lite and Xenform and Coloplast’s Direct Fix Anterior were withdrawn. That order covered prolapse repair, not every sling used for stress urinary incontinence. Bard stopped selling its mesh in the U.S. by December 31, 2016.
I have mesh and no problems. Should I do anything?
The FDA says there is no need for additional action if you are satisfied and have no symptoms; keep up routine check-ups. Tell your doctor if you have persistent vaginal bleeding or discharge, pelvic or groin pain, or pain with sex, and mention the mesh before any future surgery.
Is this the same as the hernia mesh lawsuits?
No. Hernia mesh is a different product used in abdominal surgery, with its own lawsuits and settlements. If your mesh was for a hernia, see the hernia mesh lawsuit calculator instead.
Separate from this case: were you injured in the last 2 years?
Class-action payouts are fixed amounts through an administrator. A personal injury claim is a different case — and often worth far more. Free estimate, no obligation.
Related Consumer Brand Lawsuits
Medical Device Lawsuit Calculator
How implant injury claims are valued, step by step
Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Calculator
A different mesh, a different set of lawsuits
Open Class Action Settlements
Settlements that are taking claims right now
Settlement Payout Calculator
Estimate what a class settlement pays per person