Unilever Paid a Reported $1.5 Billion for Dr. Squatch. The Brand Will Pay $9 Million Over the Word “Natural” — 50 Cents a Product, Five Products Without a Receipt, $12.50 at Most. The Twist Is in the Fine Print: If Few People File, the 50 Cents Goes Up. Claims Close November 27.
Guzman v. Dr. Squatch, LLC (Los Angeles Superior Court, No. 25STCV03523) settles three years of litigation in three courts over one word on the label. The court signed preliminary approval on July 15, 2026; the class period runs from November 1, 2018 to August 29, 2026, and the official site went live with a claim form at the end of August. We read the settlement agreement, the claim form and the long-form notice rather than the summaries. The per-product rate is a starting point, not a ceiling: the agreement says it is “increased on a pro rata basis” if valid claims come in under the net fund, and nothing reverts to the company.
By Settlement Insight Data Desk ·

One word, three courts, six named plaintiffs
The lawsuit is about the word “natural” on Dr. Squatch packaging. The consolidated complaint in Los Angeles alleges the company “intentionally label[ed]” its products “with false and misleading claims that they are natural, when [the] products contain synthetic ingredients.” Dr. Squatch “has at all times denied, and continues to deny” that, and the settlement site states the company “maintains that the Products were properly labeled as natural.” Nothing in the settlement decides who is right.
The case did not start in Los Angeles. A shampoo buyer named Lauren Fleming sued in federal court in Chicago in 2022 (Fleming v. Dr. Squatch, N.D. Ill. No. 1:22-cv-04842); in an April 2024 ruling reported by Top Class Actions, U.S. District Judge LaShonda A. Hunt let her consumer-fraud and unjust-enrichment claims proceed while dismissing warranty, negligent-misrepresentation, fraud and injunctive-relief claims. A second buyer, Perry Bruno, sued in federal court in Los Angeles in 2024 (Bruno v. Squatch, C.D. Cal. No. 2:24-cv-07798). Those names now sit alongside four others — Victor Guzman, David Plowden, Karen Betzag and Jaime Napolitano — as the six class representatives in the state-court case that settled, No. 25STCV03523 in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
The court granted preliminary approval by an order dated July 15, 2026. That date matters for the class definition: the order defines the class period as November 1, 2018 “through the date 45 days after entry of this Preliminary Approval Order,” which is how the official site arrives at August 29, 2026. Anyone who bought a covered product in that window, in the United States, from any retailer, is in the class unless they opt out.
50 cents a product: what the claim form actually says
The settlement agreement (section 4.1.5) and the claim form use identical language, and it is worth reading precisely because the headline numbers are small:
- With proof of purchase: “a payment of $0.50 per Product for which Proof of Purchase is provided, up to a maximum of twenty (20) units” — $10.00.
- Without proof of purchase: “a payment of $0.50 per Product, up to a maximum of five (5) units” — $2.50.
- Both lanes stack. The agreement's own example: twenty units with proof plus five without “shall receive compensation for twenty-five units for $12.50.”
- One claim per household (section 4.1.6).
Two wrinkles are easy to miss. First, “Proof of Purchase” is defined as “a point of purchase receipt from a third-party retail source (including physical and on-line retail sources).” Dr. Squatch is a direct-to-consumer brand, and the documents we read do not say that an order confirmation from the company's own website counts as third-party proof. If you bought direct, the five-unit no-receipt lane is the safe reading; the administrator can answer the rest. Second — and this is the part no summary mentions — the 50 cents is not fixed. Section 4.1.7 says that if valid claims exceed the money left after fees, costs and administration, each payment “shall be reduced on a pro rata basis,” and if valid claims come in under that amount, each payment “shall be increased on a pro rata basis.” The claim form repeats it: the $0.50 “will be adjusted on a pro-rata basis” in either direction.
The covered list is longer than soap. The settlement site's Exhibit C runs from Men's Natural Bar Soap through beard oil, body wash, cologne, conditioner, deodorant, face wash, hand sanitizer, hand soap, lip balm, lotion, post shave, shampoo, shave butter and toothpaste — roughly twenty product lines, every one of them carrying the word “natural” on the label.
Where the $9 million goes — and why the upside is real
The $9,000,000 is what the agreement calls the company's “all-inclusive, full payment”: every dollar for class members, lawyers, administration and service awards comes out of it. From the settlement site's FAQ 7 and the fee section of the agreement:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Settlement fund | $9,000,000 |
| Attorneys' fees (up to one third) | $3,000,000 |
| Attorneys' costs (up to) | $50,000 |
| Service awards, six class representatives (up to, total) | $40,000 |
| Notice and administration (estimated) | $475,000 |
| Left for claims if every request is granted | about $5,435,000 |
That is our subtraction, and it is the figure the pro rata clause works against. At 50 cents a unit, $5.4 million covers about 10.9 million claimed products; at the $12.50 household maximum, about 435,000 households would have to file the full amount before anyone's payment is cut. Consumer settlements with no-receipt lanes rarely see claim rates that high, which is why the “increased on a pro rata basis” sentence is the most valuable one in the document. The fund is also non-reversionary in practice: uncashed checks go into a second distribution to people who did cash theirs, and only if that is not feasible do the remnants go to state unclaimed-property offices — not back to Dr. Squatch.
For scale: Unilever announced on June 23, 2025 that it would acquire Dr. Squatch from Summit Partners, calling the terms undisclosed; the Financial Times reported a price of about $1.5 billion, and the deal closed on November 16, 2025. Set against that reported price, the $9 million settlement is six-tenths of one percent. Class counsel — the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman and Reese LLP, splitting fees 50/50 — will ask for a third of it.
The dates, and what to do
From the official long-form notice and FAQ:
- Claim deadline: November 27, 2026 — online at PersonalCareProductsSettlement.com, or the mail-in form postmarked by that date.
- Opt-out and objection deadline: October 13, 2026.
- Final approval hearing: March 2, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Department 11, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 312 N. Spring Street. The FAQ warns the date may change.
- Payment: nothing until the settlement is final; “there is no guarantee that money or benefits will ever be distributed,” the notice says, as every notice does. Checks or digital payment, your choice on the form.
Count your products before you file, not after: the form asks for a total number bought in the United States between November 1, 2018 and August 29, 2026, and the no-receipt lane is capped at five. Keep any third-party receipts you can find — Amazon, Target, Walmart, a pharmacy — because each one moves a unit from the $2.50 lane to the $10.00 lane. And do nothing with anyone who asks for a fee to file: the administrator is Eisner Advisory Group (EisnerAmper), P.O. Box 1389, Baton Rouge, LA 70821, 1-855-706-1956, and the claim form is free.
The Data Behind This Story
- Case
- Guzman et al. v. Dr. Squatch, LLC, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, No. 25STCV03523 (consolidating Fleming v. Dr. Squatch, N.D. Ill. No. 1:22-cv-04842, and Bruno v. Squatch, C.D. Cal. No. 2:24-cv-07798)
- Settlement fund
- $9,000,000, all-inclusive (claims, fees, costs, administration, service awards)
- Preliminary approval
- Order dated July 15, 2026
- Class
- Everyone who bought a Dr. Squatch product labeled “natural” in the United States, November 1, 2018 – August 29, 2026 (45 days after the preliminary approval order)
- Per product
- $0.50 — up to 5 products without proof of purchase ($2.50), up to 20 with proof ($10.00), cumulative maximum $12.50 per household
- Pro rata
- Adjusted in both directions: reduced if valid claims exceed the net fund, increased if they fall short (Settlement Agreement § 4.1.7)
- Proof of purchase
- “A point of purchase receipt from a third-party retail source (including physical and on-line retail sources)”
- Fees and costs
- Attorneys' fees up to $3,000,000 (one third); costs up to $50,000; service awards up to $40,000 total; administration estimated at $475,000
- Net for claims (our subtraction)
- About $5,435,000 if every request is granted — roughly 10.9 million products at $0.50
- Claim deadline
- November 27, 2026
- Opt-out / objection deadline
- October 13, 2026
- Final approval hearing
- March 2, 2027, 10:00 a.m. PT, Department 11, 312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles
- Unclaimed money
- Second distribution to class members who cashed their payment; if not feasible, state unclaimed-property offices — nothing reverts to Dr. Squatch
- Administrator
- Eisner Advisory Group LLC (EisnerAmper), P.O. Box 1389, Baton Rouge, LA 70821 · 1-855-706-1956 · PersonalCareProductsSettlement.com
- Context
- Unilever agreed to acquire Dr. Squatch on June 23, 2025 (terms undisclosed; Financial Times reported about $1.5 billion) and completed the deal on November 16, 2025
- Source: PersonalCareProductsSettlement.com (Eisner Advisory Group) — home page, FAQs 6–7, 14, 19–20, and the Court Documents page, read September 2, 2026
- Source: Settlement Agreement and Release (execution copy), Guzman v. Dr. Squatch — §§ 2.40 (Proof of Purchase), 2.48 (Settlement Amount), 4.1.5–4.1.7 (per-product benefit, household limit, pro rata adjustment), 4.2.6 (second distribution); downloaded from the official site September 2, 2026
- Source: Mail-In Claim Form, Part B — “$0.50 per Product,” five units without and twenty with Proof of Purchase, “$12.50” example, pro rata sentence
- Source: Long-Form Notice — deadlines November 27, 2026 (claims) and October 13, 2026 (opt out/object); “no guarantee that money or benefits will ever be distributed”
- Source: Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, signed July 15, 2026 — class period “through the date 45 days after entry of this Preliminary Approval Order,” incentive award $40,000
- Source: PR Newswire, August 31, 2026 — court-authorized notice issued by the settlement administrator: class period, deadlines, hearing March 2, 2027
- Source: Top Class Actions, April 29, 2024 — Fleming v. Dr. Squatch (N.D. Ill. No. 1:22-cv-04842), Judge LaShonda A. Hunt's partial denial of the motion to dismiss
- Source: Unilever press release, June 23, 2025 (acquisition agreement, terms undisclosed); Cosmetics Business, July 1, 2025, and Morning Brew, June 28, 2025 (Financial Times report of about $1.5 billion); MarketScreener (completion November 16, 2025)
Journalists: these figures are free to cite with attribution to Settlement Insight. Custom data pulls: press@settlementinsight.com.