Every Write-Up Puts the Americold Payout at $200. The Court's Own Notice Calls It an Estimate — and After Fees the Fund Holds Fewer Than 17,000 of Them.
Lamont Bracy, et al. v. Americold Logistics, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-05743-TWT, United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. Americold will pay $5,250,000 to resolve claims over two separate cybersecurity incidents — one on or about November 16, 2020, one on or about April 26, 2023. The settlement website, run by Kroll, describes the cash payment in careful language that the roundups drop: a Residual Cash Payment “which is estimated to be $200” for people notified of both incidents, or $100 for one. Residual means what it says — it is the balance left after attorneys' fees, service awards, administration costs and the cost of the credit monitoring come out of the fund first. Class Counsel will ask for up to 35% ($1,837,500). The deadline that arrives first is not the claim deadline: objections and opt-outs close September 22, 2026, seventeen days from today.
By Settlement Insight Data Desk ·
What the official settlement website actually says
Americold Realty Trust and Americold Logistics, LLC have agreed to pay $5,250,000 into a settlement fund over two cybersecurity incidents that exposed the personally identifiable information and protected health information of current and former employees and job applicants. The court-authorised website is americoldbracysettlement.com, administered by Kroll Settlement Administration LLC. Americold denies all allegations of liability and wrongdoing.
Here is the sentence that matters, in the settlement's own words: after deducting court-approved attorneys' fees and expenses, service awards, administration costs, “and the costs of providing Credit Monitoring, the balance will be used to provide Settlement Class Member Benefits.” Class members may file for “(i) a payment of up to $25,000 for unreimbursed Documented Losses and/or, (ii) a Residual Cash Payment, which is estimated to be $200” for someone notified of both the 2020 and the 2023 incident, “or $100” for someone notified of only one.
Two words in that sentence do the work. Residual — this money is the remainder, not a first charge on the fund. And estimated — the figure is a projection, not a promise. Nearly every aggregator write-up reproduces “$200” and “$100” as though they were fixed amounts. The document they are summarising does not say that.
A third benefit is genuinely additive and easy to miss: class members may also choose three years of credit monitoring, and the notice states this is available “in addition to the Cash Payment they elect.” It is not an either/or.
The arithmetic that decides whether $200 survives
Question 17 of the Long Form Notice states what the lawyers will ask for: “Attorneys' Fees of up to 35% of the Settlement Fund ($1,837,500), plus reimbursement of Expenses, as well as $3,000 Service Award payments to each of the seven (7) Settlement Class Representatives.”
That is enough to do the subtraction the coverage skipped. Start at $5,250,000. Take out $1,837,500 in fees if the court awards the full request, and $21,000 for the seven service awards. What remains is $3,391,500 — and expenses, administration costs and the cost of buying three years of credit monitoring for everyone who elects it have not been deducted yet.
Divide that ceiling by the estimated payment. $3,391,500 ÷ $200 = 16,957. So the fund, before its remaining costs, holds fewer than 17,000 full double-incident payments — or about 33,900 single-incident payments at $100, or some mix of the two, minus whatever documented-loss claims of up to $25,000 each are approved.
This is not a criticism of the settlement. It is how residual funds work, and a low claim rate is exactly what makes the $200 estimate reasonable. But it explains the word “estimated,” and it tells you what moves the number: how many people file, how many claim documented losses, how many elect credit monitoring, and what the court actually awards in fees. The notice does not publish a class size, and without one nobody outside the case can check the estimate. Reports putting the class at roughly 189,000 people trace to secondary coverage, not to the court file we were able to read; we are not treating that figure as established.
The deadline everyone will miss is three weeks before the one they are watching
The claim deadline is October 22, 2026. That is the date in the headlines. But two earlier deadlines fall on the same day, September 22, 2026 — seventeen days from today:
- Exclusion (opt-out). Postmarked or submitted online on or before September 22, 2026. Opting out is the only way to keep your own right to sue Americold over these incidents.
- Objection. Submitted by mail and postmarked on or before September 22, 2026, if you want to tell the court what you dislike — including the fee request.
There is a further oddity worth knowing. The Final Approval Hearing is October 6, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. ET — sixteen days before the claim window closes. The judge will decide whether to approve the settlement while claims are still coming in. That ordering is normal in class practice, but it means the hearing is not your last chance to act: if you have not filed by October 6, you still have until October 22.
Payment does not follow approval immediately. Question 14 of the notice is blunt about it: benefits are distributed “as soon as possible, if and when the Court grants Final Approval of the Settlement and after any appeals are resolved,” and it warns that “it is always uncertain whether appeals will be filed and, if so, how long it will take to resolve them.”
What to do if you got a notice
You were identified by Americold's own records, so you do not have to prove class membership — the notice states that “Defendant's records indicate you are a Settlement Class Member.” The class is all persons in the United States who were notified by Americold that their information was impacted in the data incidents.
Three practical points. First, if you have out-of-pocket losses you can document — communication expenses, credit report costs, credit monitoring you already bought, identity theft losses — the documented-loss track runs up to $25,000 and is worth the paperwork; the residual payment is not the only option. Second, take the credit monitoring even if you also take cash, because the notice says you can have both. Third, if you plan to opt out or object, that decision is due September 22, not October 22.
The administrator can be reached at (833) 930-0248 or at Lamont Bracy v. Americold Logistics, LLC, c/o Kroll Settlement Administration LLC, P.O. Box 225391, New York, NY 10150-5391. Kroll's site states it is “the only authorized website for this case.” If a site asks you to pay a fee to file, it is not this one — filing is free.
The Data Behind This Story
- Case
- Lamont Bracy, et al. v. Americold Logistics, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-05743-TWT
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division
- Settlement fund
- $5,250,000, paid by Americold Realty Trust and Americold Logistics, LLC. Liability denied
- Incidents
- On or about November 16, 2020 (the “2020 Data Incident”) and on or about April 26, 2023 (the “2023 Data Incident”)
- Who is covered
- All persons in the United States notified by Americold that their private information was impacted. Current and former employees and job applicants; PII and PHI
- Cash payment
- A Residual Cash Payment “estimated to be” $200 (notified of both incidents) or $100 (one incident only). The word in the notice is estimated, not fixed
- Documented losses
- Up to $25,000 for unreimbursed documented losses, claimable instead of or alongside the residual payment
- Credit monitoring
- Three years, available in addition to the cash payment — not instead of it
- Attorneys' fees requested
- Up to 35% of the fund ($1,837,500), plus expenses, plus $3,000 service awards to each of seven class representatives
- What is left after the fee request
- $5,250,000 − $1,837,500 − $21,000 = $3,391,500, before expenses, administration costs and the cost of the credit monitoring. That is fewer than 17,000 payments of $200
- Claim deadline
- October 22, 2026 — online or postmarked
- Opt-out deadline
- September 22, 2026
- Objection deadline
- September 22, 2026 — by mail, postmarked
- Final approval hearing
- October 6, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. ET — sixteen days before the claim window closes
- Administrator
- Kroll Settlement Administration LLC, P.O. Box 225391, New York, NY 10150-5391; (833) 930-0248
- Official site
- americoldbracysettlement.com — described by the administrator as the only authorized website for this case
- Not established
- The class size. The notice we read does not state one, and without it the $200 estimate cannot be checked from outside. A figure of about 189,000 circulates in secondary coverage only
- Source: Official settlement website americoldbracysettlement.com (Kroll Settlement Administration), Home and Important Documents pages, retrieved September 5, 2026
- Source: Bracy v. Americold — Long Form Notice, linked from that site: settlement benefits paragraph on page 1; Question 14 (when benefits are paid); Question 17 (fees of up to 35% / $1,837,500, expenses, and $3,000 service awards to each of seven class representatives)
- Source: The residual payment is quoted as the notice states it — “estimated to be” $200 or $100, paid from the balance left after fees, service awards, administration costs and the cost of credit monitoring
- Source: The figure of $3,391,500 and the count of fewer than 17,000 payments are our arithmetic on those published numbers ($5,250,000 − $1,837,500 − $21,000), before expenses, administration costs and credit monitoring are deducted
- Source: No class size is stated in the notice we read. A figure of roughly 189,000 appears in secondary coverage only and is not treated here as established
Journalists: these figures are free to cite with attribution to Settlement Insight. Custom data pulls: press@settlementinsight.com.