Mazda Lawsuit: The New Cookie-Tracking Case and the Closed Infotainment Settlement
Questions about this case?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
The Mazda lawsuit in the news right now is a privacy case: two website visitors sued Mazda Motor of America on August 21, 2026, alleging that MazdaUSA.com kept sending data to YouTube and Adobe after they clicked “decline all” on the cookie banner. It is a new, unproven complaint — there is no settlement and no claim form. The older Mazda Connect infotainment settlement, the one most people mean by “Mazda lawsuit payout,” closed for claims on August 1, 2025.
Editorially Reviewed — Content reviewed for accuracy using published legal research, government data, and verified court records. See our methodology
Reviewed by Leonard Goldberg, Editor · Last updated
What the New Mazda Lawsuit Alleges
According to the complaint as reported, the two plaintiffs visited mazdausa.com between 2022 and 2024 to research vehicles, including CX-series models and the CX-50, and clicked “decline all” on the cookie banner before browsing. The lawsuit alleges that Mazda’s site still placed third-party cookies from Google’s YouTube service and from Adobe, and that the browser kept sending requests carrying those cookies to youtube.com and omtrdc.net, an Adobe domain, after the opt-out.
The plaintiffs say this let third parties capture browsing history, shopping behavior and location data. They plead invasion of privacy, wiretapping, unlawful use of a pen register, fraud and unjust enrichment. Mazda has not been found liable for anything; these are allegations only.
Case Details
The case is Shah, et al. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., filed August 21, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. News reports list it as No. 4:26-cv-08744; the complaint’s header shows No. 5:26-cv-08744-BLF, the San Jose division. The plaintiffs are represented by Gutride Safier LLP and demand a jury trial.
Separately, the infotainment settlement was reached in Duffy, et al. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., No. 3:24-cv-388-BJB, in the Western District of Kentucky before Judge Benjamin Beaton. That docket closed on June 11, 2026.
Status: One New Case, One Finished Settlement
Infotainment settlement: closed. The claim deadline was August 1, 2025, and the official site, MazdaInfotainmentSettlement.com, now reads “This case is no longer active.” You cannot file a new Mazda lawsuit claim there. The automatic warranty extension it created still applies to vehicles within its 24-month window.
Other Mazda cases. A 2024 engine-defect suit, Cauller v. Mazda Motor of America, No. 8:24-cv-01807 (C.D. Cal.), alleges coolant leaks in SKYACTIV-G 2.5T engines; it has no settlement we could confirm. In Australia, the regulator’s case ended in a court-ordered penalty, not a consumer payout (see below).
Follow this case
There's no claim deadline yet. We'll email you if a settlement opens a claim period.
Who Could Be Affected
Cookie case. The complaint proposes a nationwide class of mazdausa.com visitors who clicked “decline all,” plus a California subclass. No class has been certified. You do not sign up for a proposed class; if the case ever settles, a court-appointed administrator gives notice. Nothing you need to do today.
Infotainment settlement. The class covered U.S. owners and lessees, current or former, of these vehicles with Mazda Connect: Mazda2 2016–2022, Mazda3 2014–2018, Mazda6 2016–2021, CX-3 2016–2021, CX-5 2016–2020, CX-9 2016–2020 and MX-5 2016–2023. If you are in that group and did not opt out by July 2, 2025, you are covered by the settlement terms whether or not you filed a claim, once the court approves it.
Mazda Lawsuit Payout: What Exists and What Does Not
Infotainment settlement: reimbursement, not a flat payment. It repaid documented out-of-pocket costs for Mazda Connect software updates and for repairing or replacing the connectivity master unit (CMU), SD card, display and rear-view camera — up to $1,750 per vehicle. Claims needed receipts or repair orders and had to be filed by August 1, 2025. Mazda agreed to pay attorneys’ fees of up to $1,900,000 separately, so fees do not reduce owner reimbursements. If you filed a claim and have questions about your check, contact the administrator, JND Legal Administration, at (844) 552-0064.
Mazda class action Australia payout. We found no Australian consumer class action against Mazda with a payout. The case people mean is the ACCC’s: on 14 February 2024 the Federal Court ordered Mazda Australia to pay A$11.5 million in penalties for misleading nine customers about their refund and replacement rights. That is a penalty, not a fund you can claim from.
Mazda Lawsuit Timeline
- 1
October 2019 — ACCC Sues Mazda Australia
Australia’s consumer regulator sues over how Mazda handled nine customers with recurring faults, including repeated engine replacements.
- 2
February 14, 2024 — A$11.5 Million Penalty
The Federal Court orders Mazda Australia to pay A$11.5 million in penalties for 49 false or misleading representations to nine consumers.
- 3
June 28, 2024 — Infotainment Suit Filed in Kentucky
Duffy v. Mazda Motor of America is filed in the Western District of Kentucky over Mazda Connect freezing, rebooting and backup-camera failures.
- 4
August 1, 2025 — Infotainment Claim Deadline
Last day to file for reimbursement of repair costs, up to $1,750 per vehicle. The final approval hearing had been set for July 28, 2025.
- 5
June 11, 2026 — Infotainment Case Closed
The Duffy docket is terminated. The official settlement website now says the case is no longer active.
- 6
August 21, 2026 — Cookie-Tracking Suit Filed
Shah v. Mazda Motor of America is filed in the Northern District of California, alleging tracking after visitors clicked “decline all.” No settlement exists.
Three Things to Watch For
A brand-new privacy case and an old settlement with the same company name are an easy mix-up to exploit:
“Claim your Mazda cookie settlement” pages
There is no settlement in the cookie-tracking case, so there is no claim form. A site asking for your email, address or bank details to “reserve your share” is collecting data, not filing anything.
“Late infotainment claims accepted”
The infotainment claim deadline was August 1, 2025, and the official site says the case is no longer active. Anyone offering to file a late claim for a fee cannot deliver it. The only administrator was JND Legal Administration.
Fake warranty-extension calls
The settlement’s warranty extension is automatic — no fee, no sign-up. Calls or mailers saying your “Mazda warranty is expiring” and asking for payment are typical auto-warranty sales pitches, not the settlement. Check coverage with a Mazda dealer using your VIN.
Mazda Lawsuit — Questions People Actually Ask
What is the Mazda lawsuit in the news right now?
A privacy class action filed August 21, 2026 in federal court in Northern California, Shah v. Mazda Motor of America. It alleges MazdaUSA.com let YouTube and Adobe cookies track visitors who had clicked “decline all.” It is a new complaint; nothing has been proven or paid.
Is there a Mazda lawsuit settlement I can file a claim for?
Not as of October 2026. The cookie case has no settlement. The Mazda Connect infotainment settlement closed for claims on August 1, 2025. To browse settlements that are taking claims now, see open class action settlements.
What was the Mazda lawsuit infotainment system settlement?
Duffy v. Mazda Motor of America (W.D. Ky.) settled claims that Mazda Connect screens froze, rebooted or lost the backup camera. It reimbursed documented repair costs up to $1,750 per vehicle and added an automatic 24-month warranty extension for Mazda Connect software and the CMU.
I missed the infotainment claim deadline. Is anything left for me?
Cash reimbursement is no longer available. The warranty extension did not require a claim: for cars whose original warranty had already expired, it ran 24 months from February 17, 2025; for newer cars it starts when the original warranty ends. A Mazda dealer can check your VIN.
Is there a Mazda class action Australia payout?
Not one we could verify. The Australian case was brought by the ACCC, and the Federal Court ordered Mazda Australia to pay A$11.5 million in penalties in February 2024. Penalties are not paid out to owners as a claimable fund.
Do I have to do anything about the cookie-tracking case?
No. You cannot join a proposed class by signing up. If a class is certified or a settlement is reached, notice comes from a court-appointed administrator. Be wary of anyone asking for personal data to “join” it.
How much could the cookie case pay?
No one can say. There is no settlement and no court ruling on the claims. Use our class action payout calculator only as a rough guide to how settlements are typically divided.
Are there other Mazda lawsuits?
Yes. Cauller v. Mazda Motor of America, No. 8:24-cv-01807 (C.D. Cal.), alleges an engine defect causing coolant leaks and overheating in several 2016–2024 models. We found no settlement in that case. Personal-injury and individual lemon-law cases are separate and are not class settlements.
Separate from this case: were you injured in the last 2 years?
Class-action payouts are fixed amounts through an administrator. A personal injury claim is a different case — and often worth far more. Free estimate, no obligation.
Related Consumer Brand Lawsuits
Open Class Action Settlements
Settlements still accepting claims, with deadlines
Class Action Payout Calculator
Estimate how a settlement fund is split per claimant
GM OnStar Data Privacy Lawsuit
Another automaker privacy case and where it stands
Toyota Lawsuit
The Toyota airbag settlement and how to claim