Kyleena Lawsuit: What Actually Exists in Court
Questions about this case?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
Kyleena is Bayer’s smaller five-year hormonal IUD. As of October 2026 we could find no Kyleena settlement, no Kyleena class action and no federal MDL for Kyleena — so there is no claim form and no deadline. Most of what you see under “kyleena lawsuit” is attorney advertising that borrows from the older Mirena litigation, which Bayer largely won.
Editorially Reviewed — Content reviewed for accuracy using published legal research, government data, and verified court records. See our methodology
Reviewed by Leonard Goldberg, Editor · Last updated
What the Ads and Claims Say
Law-firm pages recruiting for a “kyleena lawsuit” describe individual product-liability claims: the device migrating, perforating the uterus, embedding in tissue, ectopic pregnancy, and pseudotumor cerebri (also called idiopathic intracranial hypertension). The theory is failure to warn — that Bayer did not adequately tell patients and doctors about those risks. These are allegations from advertisers, not findings by any court.
The other side of that argument is in the label itself. The Kyleena prescribing information dated September 2016 already warns that “uterine perforation may occur and may reduce contraceptive effectiveness or require surgery,” that expulsion can go unnoticed, and that a pregnancy with Kyleena in place carries an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy. A failure-to-warn claim has to explain why that wording was not enough.
Case Details
No court has a Kyleena-specific class action or MDL that we could locate as of October 2026. Even a lawsuit-recruiting site reports that “there is still no consolidated federal MDL specifically for Kyleena, and no global settlement has been announced by Bayer” as of September 2026.
What does exist involves Mirena, Bayer’s larger sister IUD with the same hormone:
Perforation MDL — MDL No. 2434 (S.D.N.Y., created 2013, Judge Cathy Seibel). Per the law firm Miller & Zois, the judge dismissed about 1,300 perforation cases in 2016 after rejecting the plaintiffs’ experts, and the Second Circuit affirmed in October 2017.
Intracranial hypertension MDL — MDL No. 2767. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created it on April 6, 2017 with 113 actions in 17 districts and assigned it to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the Southern District of New York. Judgment for Bayer was entered June 21, 2019; the Second Circuit affirmed on December 8, 2020 (No. 19-2155).
Breast-cancer class action — Copeland v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 5:24-cv-03042 (N.D. Cal.), filed May 20, 2024. It alleges Mirena raises breast cancer risk by “approximately 20-30%.” Its proposed class is people who paid out of pocket for a Mirena IUD; the complaint does not mention Kyleena.
Status: No Kyleena Case to Join
Individual injury suits can be filed by anyone, and some law firms say they are filing them. That is different from a class action or settlement: each case stands alone and pays nothing unless that person wins or settles.
The track record matters. Both Mirena MDLs ended with the plaintiffs’ causation experts excluded, and the dismissals were affirmed on appeal (the intracranial hypertension MDL with judgment for Bayer). Per Miller & Zois, some Mirena cases did settle, for extremely low payouts. A Kyleena perforation or pseudotumor claim would face the same scientific questions. We could not confirm from a primary source how the Copeland breast-cancer case stands as of October 2026; it concerns Mirena only.
Are You Affected?
There is no Kyleena class, so there is nothing to be “in.” You are not automatically part of any Kyleena case because you used the device.
If you had Mirena and paid out of pocket, the Copeland complaint proposes a nationwide class and a California subclass. No class has been certified that we could confirm, and you do not sign up for a proposed class.
If you had a serious injury — surgery to remove a migrated or embedded device, an ectopic pregnancy, or diagnosed intracranial hypertension — your only route is an individual claim. Keep your insertion and removal records, imaging, operative notes and the device lot information. Filing deadlines (statutes of limitations) differ by state and often run from when you learned of the injury, so an attorney’s view on timing is worth more than any online questionnaire.
What a Kyleena Claim Pays
Dollar ranges on recruiting sites — one lists “$25,000 to $75,000” for a mild injury without surgery — are not drawn from any Kyleena verdict or settlement. For context only: the Mirena perforation and intracranial hypertension litigation ended with the plaintiffs’ causation experts excluded, although some cases settled for what Miller & Zois calls extremely low payouts, and the law firm Miller & Zois calls the Mirena litigation “ultimately unsuccessful for victims.” Our payout calculator explains how real settlements are split, if one ever appears.
Kyleena and Mirena Litigation Timeline
- 1
2013 — Mirena Perforation MDL Created
Federal Mirena cases alleging uterine perforation and migration are centralized as MDL No. 2434 in the Southern District of New York.
- 2
September 2016 — Kyleena Label
Kyleena’s prescribing information is dated September 2016. It warns of uterine perforation, unnoticed expulsion and ectopic pregnancy. Per Miller & Zois, about 1,300 Mirena perforation cases were dismissed that year.
- 3
April 6, 2017 — Mirena Intracranial Hypertension MDL
The JPML centralizes 113 Mirena intracranial hypertension actions from 17 districts as MDL No. 2767 before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.
- 4
June 21, 2019 — Judgment for Bayer
After the plaintiffs’ general-causation experts are excluded, judgment is entered for Bayer in MDL No. 2767. The Second Circuit affirms on December 8, 2020.
- 5
May 20, 2024 — Mirena Breast-Cancer Class Action
Copeland v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (N.D. Cal., No. 5:24-cv-03042) is filed on behalf of Mirena buyers. It does not name Kyleena.
- 6
October 2026 — No Kyleena Case or Settlement
As of October 2026 there is no Kyleena MDL, class action, settlement or claim form that we could find. Recruiting ads continue.
Three Things to Watch For
A widely searched device with no actual settlement is ideal territory for lead harvesting:
“Check your Kyleena settlement eligibility” forms
There is no Kyleena settlement to be eligible for. These forms usually collect your medical history and phone number to sell as a legal lead. Read who receives the data before you submit.
“Join the Kyleena class action” ads
No Kyleena class action exists that we could find. What these ads offer is an individual retainer, often on contingency — a real contract with fees and obligations, not registration for a group payout.
Calls or texts quoting a payout figure
Nobody can tell you what a Kyleena claim is worth when no Kyleena case has settled or gone to verdict. A caller promising a fixed amount, or asking for a fee or your Social Security number to “release” it, is not a court administrator.
Kyleena Lawsuit — Questions People Actually Ask
Is there a Kyleena class action lawsuit?
Not that we could find as of October 2026. There is no Kyleena class action, no Kyleena MDL and no Kyleena settlement. The class action in the news, Copeland v. Bayer (N.D. Cal., No. 5:24-cv-03042), is about Mirena and breast cancer, and its proposed class covers Mirena buyers only.
Is there a Kyleena settlement or claim form?
No. There is no fund, no administrator, no claim form and no deadline. If that ever changes, a court-appointed administrator would publish an official site and notice — check our open settlements list rather than a search ad.
Why do ads say I can sue over Kyleena?
Anyone with an injury can file an individual product-liability suit, and some firms are recruiting for that. The ads borrow from Bayer’s Mirena litigation, which involved the same hormone. But both Mirena MDLs ended with the plaintiffs’ experts excluded and the dismissals affirmed by the Second Circuit.
Is Kyleena the same as Mirena?
Both are Bayer levonorgestrel IUDs. Kyleena is a smaller device with a lower dose — 19.5 mg of levonorgestrel per its label, approved for up to five years. Court rulings about Mirena do not automatically apply to Kyleena, in either direction.
Does the Mirena breast-cancer lawsuit cover Kyleena users?
Not as written. The Copeland complaint, filed May 20, 2024, defines its class as people who paid out of pocket for “a Mirena IUD or for a procedure to insert a Mirena IUD.” Kyleena is not mentioned. We could not confirm the case’s status as of October 2026.
My Kyleena moved or perforated my uterus. What should I do?
Get medical care first. Then keep every record: insertion date, removal surgery, imaging and operative notes. The Kyleena label lists perforation as a known risk, so a claim would need to show more than that it happened. A licensed attorney in your state can tell you whether a deadline applies.
What about the Paragard IUD lawsuit?
That is a different device — a copper IUD from a different manufacturer — and a separate federal MDL. It is covered on our Paragard IUD lawsuit page. Nothing in it covers Kyleena.
Is a letter or email about a Kyleena settlement real?
Since no Kyleena settlement exists, a message claiming you are owed Kyleena money is almost certainly lead generation or a scam. Real settlement notices name the case, the court and an administrator, and never ask for a fee.
Separate from this case: were you injured in the last 2 years?
Class-action payouts are fixed amounts through an administrator. A personal injury claim is a different case — and often worth far more. Free estimate, no obligation.