FragranceNet Lawsuit: The Text-Message Class Action, Explained
Questions about this case?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
The FragranceNet lawsuit in the news is a proposed class action filed August 11, 2026 over marketing texts — sent, it alleges, to numbers on the Do-Not-Call Registry and before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. It is at the earliest stage. There is no settlement, no fund and no claim form, and nobody has been paid anything.
Editorially Reviewed — Content reviewed for accuracy using published legal research, government data, and verified court records. See our methodology
Reviewed by Leonard Goldberg, Editor · Last updated
What the Lawsuit Says Happened
The named plaintiff says she received several promotional texts from FragranceNet in May 2026 on a phone number that had been on the National Do-Not-Call Registry since January 2016. The lawsuit alleges that at least one message was sent before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. local time, that the texts carried no opt-out instructions, and that FragranceNet had neither a signed written agreement allowing marketing texts nor an existing business relationship with her.
The complaint relies on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s do-not-call provision, 47 U.S.C. § 227(c), and the FCC’s quiet-hours and registry rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(c)(1) and (c)(2). It seeks an injunction, statutory damages, treble damages for willful or knowing violations, and costs. These are allegations; FragranceNet has not been found liable for anything.
Case Details
The case is Velazquez v. Telescents, Inc. d/b/a FragranceNet, No. 2:26-cv-08890, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Telescents, Inc. is the company named as doing business as FragranceNet. The plaintiff is represented by PLG Damage Attorneys. The assigned judge could not be confirmed from the free court record.
Two proposed groups are pleaded, both reaching back four years from filing (to August 11, 2022): people who got more than one FragranceNet marketing text within a 12-month period with at least one sent before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m., and a subclass whose number had been on the Do-Not-Call Registry for at least 30 days before the first challenged text. Neither group has been certified. Our earlier report found that the same lawyer filed a second suit against the same defendant in the same court on the same day.
Status: Early Stage, No Settlement
That means no fund, no administrator, no claim form and no deadline. Our news report has the docket details and the damages math: FragranceNet text-message case: $500 is a ceiling, and there is no claim form.
Not the same case: a separate price-fixing class action in New Jersey federal court targets four fragrance manufacturers (Firmenich, Givaudan, IFF and Symrise), not FragranceNet. One manufacturer, IFF, reached proposed settlements with three plaintiff groups worth $44 million in total, but the case concerns companies that bought fragrance ingredients directly from the manufacturers between January 1, 2018 and April 18, 2023, not shoppers.
Follow this case
There's no claim deadline yet. We'll email you if a settlement opens a claim period.
Who Could Be in the Proposed Classes
Based on the class definitions as reported, you could fall within the proposed groups if, at any point since August 11, 2022:
• you received more than one FragranceNet marketing text within 12 months, and at least one arrived before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. your local time; or
• you received more than one such text within 12 months on a number that had been on the Do-Not-Call Registry for at least 30 days.
There is nothing to sign up for. If a class is certified or a settlement is reached, class members are notified by a court-appointed administrator. What helps you now is evidence: keep the texts and screenshots that show the time you received them.
What a Case Like This Could Pay
The “$500 to $1,500 per text” figure circulating online mostly comes from a different part of the law. Under § 227(c)(5), the provision this case relies on, a court may award “up to $500 in damages for each such violation” and may, in its discretion, triple that for willful or knowing violations. The statute also gives the company a defense if it shows it had reasonable do-not-call procedures in place with due care. TCPA class settlements, when they happen, are usually split among everyone who files a claim, so per-person amounts tend to be far below the statutory maximum. Try our payout calculator for a rough idea of how claim rates affect shares.
FragranceNet Lawsuit Timeline
- 1
2017 to 2020 — Earlier FragranceNet Cases
A group of workers sued FragranceNet.com in New York federal court in 2017 over job discrimination (No. 2:17-cv-04678). In February 2020 a separate TCPA suit over promotional texts, Shears-Barnes v. FragranceNet.com (No. 1:20-cv-00846), was filed in the Eastern District of New York. We could not confirm how it ended.
- 2
February 24, 2025 — Website Accessibility Suit
An individual sued Telescents, Inc. in New York, alleging fragrancenet.com is not sufficiently accessible to people with disabilities. It is a single-plaintiff case, not a consumer class action.
- 3
May 2026 — The Texts at Issue
The plaintiff says she received several FragranceNet promotional texts on a number registered on the Do-Not-Call list since 2016, including at least one outside 8 a.m. to 9 p.m.
- 4
August 11, 2026 — Class Action Filed
Velazquez v. Telescents, Inc. d/b/a FragranceNet, No. 2:26-cv-08890, is filed in the Central District of California under 47 U.S.C. § 227(c).
- 5
September 4, 2026 — The Case Hits the News
Consumer legal sites report the suit. There is no list to be added to.
- 6
October 2026 — Still Early, No Settlement
As of October 2026 no settlement, dismissal or class certification had been reported. No claim form or deadline exists.
Three Things to Watch For
A text-message case attracts a specific kind of trap, often by text:
“Claim your FragranceNet settlement” texts
There is no settlement, so there is no payment link. A text or email offering a FragranceNet payout, a refund code or a “class member verification” is phishing. Do not click it, and do not reply with personal details.
Fake FragranceNet discount messages
Scammers copy retailer promotions. Before entering card details, check that you are on fragrancenet.com by typing the address yourself, not by tapping a shortened link in a message.
“Add me to the lawsuit” sign-up forms
Forms on ad-driven sites and comment boxes do not put you in the class. They usually pass your details to a law firm as a lead. If you sign anything, read whether it is a retainer agreement before you sign it.
FragranceNet Lawsuit — Questions People Actually Ask
What is the FragranceNet lawsuit about?
It is a proposed class action, filed August 11, 2026, alleging that FragranceNet sent marketing texts to numbers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry and sent at least some before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m., in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case is Velazquez v. Telescents, Inc. d/b/a FragranceNet, No. 2:26-cv-08890 (C.D. Cal.).
Is there a FragranceNet settlement or claim form?
No. As of October 2026 no settlement had been reported, and there is no fund, administrator, claim form or deadline. If that changes, class members are notified by a court-appointed administrator.
How much money could I get?
Nothing right now. The law relied on allows a court to award up to $500 per violation, possibly tripled for willful violations at the court’s discretion, but any class settlement would be divided among claimants. No court has valued these claims.
Do I need to do anything to join?
No. You cannot sign up for a class; if one is certified, you are included unless you opt out. Keep any FragranceNet texts, with screenshots showing the time you received them.
I signed up for FragranceNet texts myself. Am I covered?
Possibly not. The complaint stresses that the plaintiff gave no permission and had no business relationship with FragranceNet. Consent and the details of how you opted in are likely to be central defenses. How the court treats people who opted in has not been decided.
Is this related to the fragrance price-fixing settlement?
No. That is a separate case in New Jersey federal court against fragrance manufacturers, where IFF reached proposed settlements with three plaintiff groups worth $44 million in total. The case concerns companies that bought fragrance ingredients directly from the manufacturers, not people who shopped at FragranceNet.
Who is Telescents, Inc.?
Telescents, Inc. is the company sued as doing business as FragranceNet. Earlier suits name FragranceNet.com, Inc.; whether the two are the same legal entity is something we have not verified.
How do I stop unwanted marketing texts?
Reply STOP to the sender, and register your number free at donotcall.gov. The proposed registry subclass here requires a listing of at least 30 days before the first text, so registering helps going forward, not retroactively.
Separate from this case: were you injured in the last 2 years?
Class-action payouts are fixed amounts through an administrator. A personal injury claim is a different case — and often worth far more. Free estimate, no obligation.
Related Consumer Brand Lawsuits
Open Class Action Settlements
Settlements currently accepting claims, with deadlines
Class Action Payout Calculator
Estimate your share based on fund size and claim rates
O'Reilly TCPA Settlement
A Do-Not-Call text message case that did settle
Money Source Robocall Settlement
Prerecorded-call TCPA case that pays without a claim form