Apple's $250 Million Siri Settlement Covers About 37 Million iPhones — $6.76 Each if Everyone Claimed. The Court Presumes $25, Caps It at $95, and Claims Opened September 21. The Deadline Is December 21, 2026.
This is not the Siri settlement that paid out in January. That was Lopez v. Apple, $95 million, for recordings — and it is closed. The new one is Landsheft v. Apple, $250 million, for iPhone 16 and 15 Pro buyers who were sold “Apple Intelligence” Siri features that did not arrive. Judge Noel Wise granted preliminary approval on July 17, 2026 and ordered notice to begin within 45 days — by August 31. On August 28 Apple filed a stipulation to push the notice date, the claims deadline and the opt-out deadline back, and Judge Wise granted it the same day: notice began September 21, 2026, and claims, objections and opt-outs are due December 21, 2026. Here is what the court documents actually say, and the arithmetic behind “$25 to $95.”
By Settlement Insight Data Desk · · Updated

Two Siri settlements. Only one of them is still open — since September 21, 2026.
If you received a small Apple payment in late January 2026, it came from Lopez v. Apple: the $95 million settlement over Siri recordings, administered at VoiceAssistantSettlement.com, with claims that closed on July 2, 2025 and payments sent January 23–26, 2026. That case is finished. Our tracker for it says so at the top.
The settlement that people are searching for now is a different lawsuit with a different theory and more than two and a half times the money. Landsheft, et al. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 5:25-cv-02668-NW in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose), is a consolidated class action alleging that Apple marketed “Enhanced Siri” features powered by Apple Intelligence when it launched the iPhone 16 line, and that buyers paid a premium for features that were not delivered. Apple denies wrongdoing; MacRumors quotes the company as settling “to stay focused” on “delivering the most innovative products and services to our users.”
The first complaint was filed March 19, 2025. Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval on May 5, 2026, the hearing was held July 8, 2026, and District Judge Noel Wise signed the Order Granting Preliminary Approval on July 17, 2026 (Docket No. 94). Nothing has been paid; claims opened on September 21, 2026, and the deadline is December 21, 2026.
Who is in: seven iPhone models, one purchase window
The order certifies, for settlement purposes only, a nationwide class defined as:
“Purchasers of the Eligible Devices (iPhone 16, iPhone 16e, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 15 Pro, or iPhone 15 Pro Max) who reside in the United States and purchased an Eligible Device in the United States for purposes other than resale, during the Class Period (June 10, 2024, to March 29, 2025).”
Three things in that sentence decide most eligibility questions. The base iPhone 15 and 15 Plus are not included — only the 15 Pro and 15 Pro Max. The window opens on June 10, 2024, the day Apple announced the features, not on the iPhone 16's September launch — so a 15 Pro bought in the summer of 2024 counts. And the class runs by device: the motion for preliminary approval says the number of Eligible Devices is “approximately 37 million,” held by “approximately 36 million consumers.” Payments are per device, so a household with two qualifying phones has two claims.
Excluded are Apple, entities it controls, its officers, directors and employees, and the judicial officers on the case with their staff and immediate families.
The arithmetic behind “$25 to $95”
The settlement creates a $250,000,000 non-reversionary fund — none of it goes back to Apple. Plaintiffs' motion describes the payment as “a presumptive Per-Device Payment of $25 for each Eligible Device, which may decrease or increase up to $95 per device depending on claim volume and other factors.” Every dollar of that is contingent on how many people file, so it is worth working through the fund.
Start with the top: $250 million divided by roughly 37 million eligible devices is $6.76 per device if every single one were claimed. That will not happen, and the $25 presumption is a bet on how few will. Work the deductions plaintiffs disclosed: Class Counsel “anticipate seeking an award of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses of no more than 28% of the Settlement Fund” — up to $70 million — with litigation expenses estimated at not more than $600,000 inside that; administration by Verita Global is budgeted at up to $5,444,056. Take those off and about $174 million is left for class members. At $25 a device, that pays roughly 7 million devices — about 19% of the 37 million. Fewer claims than that and the per-device amount rises, until it hits the $95 cap at roughly 1.8 million devices, about 5%. More claims than 7 million and the payment falls below $25. These are our figures from the motion's inputs; the actual fee award is the court's decision in February.
One more sentence from the motion belongs next to the money: plaintiffs describe the $250 million as “representing approximately 11% of estimated damages for a class of approximately 36 million consumers.” That is their damages model, offered to show the deal is within the range courts approve (they cite a MacBook keyboard settlement approved at 9–28% of estimated damages). It also tells you the scale of what was alleged.
The dates: what the court ordered, and what Apple asked to change on August 28
The July 17 order sets the machinery in relative terms. Notice “will commence no later than forty-five (45) days from the date of this Preliminary Approval Order” — that is August 31, 2026. The Claims Deadline, the Objection Deadline and the Exclusion Deadline are each “90 days from the Notice Date.” Under that schedule, claims would have opened by the end of August and closed at the end of November.
The final-approval hearing moved first. The order originally set it for September 29, 2027; on July 27 plaintiffs asked to bring it forward, noting that “Notice has not yet gone out to the Class, so there is no risk of confusion,” and on August 13, 2026 Judge Wise reset it to February 24, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. in San Jose (Docket No. 97).
Then, on August 28, 2026 — three days before the notice deadline — Apple filed a “Stipulation with Proposed Order to Extend Settlement Notice Date, Claims Deadline, and Objection and Exclusion Deadlines” (Docket No. 98). The document itself is not freely available on the public docket; MacRumors, which read it, reports the proposed schedule as notice beginning Monday, September 21, 2026 and the claims period ending Monday, December 21, 2026. Judge Wise granted the stipulation the same day, August 28, 2026 (Docket No. 99). Under that order, notice began on September 21, 2026, and the claims, objection and exclusion deadlines are all December 21, 2026 — 91 days after the notice date.
How you will hear: the order appoints Verita Global, LLC as Settlement Administrator (working with a fraud-screening firm, Covalynt). Apple hands Verita its customer list; Verita emails a notice with “two or more reminder emails,” and mails a postcard to class members for whom Apple has a postal address but no email. The settlement website named in the papers is SmartphoneAISettlement.com. When we loaded it on September 1 it returned a bot-check page, and MacRumors describes it as a “coming soon” page. Since September 21, 2026 it takes claims; its “File A Claim” buttons lead to the administrator's claim portal at aplsconnect.com. Anyone else offering to file for you is selling something else.
What to do now
File a claim by December 21, 2026: online through SmartphoneAISettlement.com, whose “File A Claim” buttons lead to the administrator's claim portal at aplsconnect.com, or on a paper form postmarked by that date. A notice by email or postcard is not a claim. The official FAQ says you must personally submit a valid claim form, with one claim per eligible device, confirming the purchase and giving “information sufficient to confirm your purchase and/or ownership”; you choose payment by physical or digital check. The official site adds that you must be the original purchaser. Keep the receipt or the order confirmation and the serial number of each qualifying phone.
Objections and opt-outs are due the same day as claims, December 21, 2026; an opt-out must be individual — the order says “so-called ‘class’ or ‘mass’ opt-outs shall not be permitted.” After that deadline, the next date is February 24, 2027, when the court decides whether the deal is final and how much of the $250 million the lawyers get. Payments cannot start before that, and appeals can push them later. We will update this page when the court rules on final approval.
Correction, September 30, 2026: an earlier version of this article said that, as of September 1, no order granting Apple's August 28 extension request had appeared. Judge Wise granted it on August 28, 2026 (Docket No. 99); claims opened September 21 and are due December 21, 2026. The article also advised checking that links point to SmartphoneAISettlement.com; the official site's “File A Claim” buttons lead to the administrator's claim portal at aplsconnect.com.
The Data Behind This Story
- Case
- Landsheft, et al. v. Apple Inc., No. 5:25-cv-02668-NW, U.S. District Court, N.D. California (San Jose), Judge Noel Wise — consolidated action; first complaint filed March 19, 2025
- Not to be confused with
- Lopez v. Apple — the $95 million Siri-recordings settlement (VoiceAssistantSettlement.com): claims closed July 2, 2025, payments sent January 23–26, 2026
- Fund
- $250,000,000, non-reversionary (nothing returns to Apple)
- Class
- U.S. residents who bought an iPhone 16, 16e, 16 Plus, 16 Pro, 16 Pro Max, 15 Pro or 15 Pro Max in the United States, not for resale, June 10, 2024 – March 29, 2025
- Size
- Approximately 37 million eligible devices; approximately 36 million consumers (plaintiffs' motion)
- Payment
- Presumptive $25 per eligible device, adjusted pro rata; capped at $95 per device
- Our arithmetic
- $6.76 per device if all 37 million were claimed; after up to 28% fees/expenses and $5.44 million administration about $174 million remains — $25 pays about 7 million devices (≈19%), the $95 cap is reached at about 1.8 million (≈5%)
- Fees requested
- No more than 28% of the fund (up to $70 million), including expenses estimated at up to $600,000; administration up to $5,444,056
- Preliminary approval
- July 17, 2026 (Docket No. 94), after a July 8 hearing
- Notice
- Began September 21, 2026 (the July 17 order had set August 31; moved by the order of August 28, 2026, Docket No. 99) — by email (with reminders) and postcard; administrator Verita Global
- Claims / objection / opt-out deadline
- December 21, 2026 for claims (online or postmarked), objections and opt-outs, under the order of August 28, 2026 (Docket No. 99)
- Pending change
- August 28, 2026: Apple filed a stipulation to extend the notice date, claims deadline and objection/exclusion deadlines (Docket No. 98); MacRumors reports proposed dates of September 21 (notice) and December 21, 2026 (claims); Judge Wise granted it the same day (Docket No. 99): notice from September 21, claims, objections and opt-outs due December 21, 2026
- Final approval hearing
- February 24, 2027, 9:00 a.m., San Jose (reset from September 29, 2027 by order of August 13, 2026)
- Website
- SmartphoneAISettlement.com — not live as of September 1, 2026 (bot-check page; MacRumors: “coming soon”); taking claims since September 21, 2026, with “File A Claim” buttons that lead to the administrator's claim portal at aplsconnect.com
- Plaintiffs' framing
- $250 million is “approximately 11% of estimated damages” (motion for preliminary approval)
- Source: Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, Landsheft v. Apple Inc., No. 5:25-cv-02668-NW (N.D. Cal.), Docket No. 94, filed July 17, 2026 — class definition, exclusions, Verita appointment, 45-day notice commencement, 90-day claims/objection/exclusion deadlines, schedule of events; read in full from the RECAP archive on September 1, 2026
- Source: Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval, Docket No. 77, filed May 5, 2026 — $250,000,000 non-reversionary fund; presumptive $25 per device and $95 cap; “approximately 37 million” eligible devices; “approximately 36 million consumers”; fees “no more than 28%”; expenses not more than $600,000; administration up to $5,444,056; email and postcard notice plan; “approximately 11% of estimated damages”
- Source: Unopposed Administrative Motion to Reset Final Approval Hearing Date (Docket No. 96, July 27, 2026) and Order granting it (Docket No. 97, August 13, 2026) — hearing moved from September 29, 2027 to February 24, 2027
- Source: CourtListener docket for 5:25-cv-02668, checked September 1, 2026 — Docket No. 98 (August 28, 2026): “Stipulation with Proposed Order to Extend Settlement Notice Date, Claims Deadline, and Objection and Exclusion Deadlines” filed by Apple Inc.; no subsequent order shown
- Source: MacRumors, August 28, 2026 — reported the proposed new schedule (notice September 21, claims through December 21, 2026) and the “coming soon” state of SmartphoneAISettlement.com; MacRumors, July 24, 2026 — Apple's statement on settling
- Source: ClassAction.org — case background (Landsheft v. Apple, filed March 19, 2025; allegations regarding AI-enhanced Siri features)
- Source: Settlement Insight tracker for Lopez v. Apple ($95 million Siri-recordings settlement) — claims closed July 2, 2025; payments January 23–26, 2026
- Source: SmartphoneAISettlement.com loaded September 1, 2026 — returned a Cloudflare verification page, no settlement content
Journalists: these figures are free to cite with attribution to Settlement Insight. Custom data pulls: press@settlementinsight.com.