Character AI Lawsuit: Where the Family Cases and State Suits Stand
Questions about this case?
AI Legal Assistant · free · answers in seconds · general information, not legal advice
Character.AI is a chatbot app where people talk to AI “Characters.” Families sued its maker, Character Technologies, its two founders and Google, alleging the app harmed their children. In January 2026 the parties agreed to settle five of those suits; the terms are not public. There is no class action, no fund and no claim form, and new suits are still being filed. If you or someone you know is struggling, call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline).
Editorially Reviewed — Content reviewed for accuracy using published legal research, government data, and verified court records. See our methodology
Reviewed by Leonard Goldberg, Editor · Last updated
What the Lawsuits Allege
The family lawsuits allege that Character.AI was built to seem human and keep young users coming back, that it had no effective age check, and that its chatbots drew minors into sexualized role-play and encouraged or trivialized self-harm. The first case, Garcia v. Character Technologies, was brought by a Florida mother whose teenage son died by suicide in 2024. It pleaded wrongful death, product liability, unjust enrichment and a Florida deceptive-practices claim alleging users were misled into believing Characters were real people, some of them licensed mental-health professionals. These are allegations. No court has found any defendant liable.
The defendants argued that the First Amendment barred the case and that Character.AI is not a “product”; Google argued it did not make or distribute the app. The company says every chat carries a disclaimer that a Character is not a real person. Google is named because, according to the complaint, the founders came from Google and in August 2024 Google paid $2.7 billion for a non-exclusive license to Character.AI's technology and rehired them.
Case Details
The lead case was Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., No. 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Florida, Orlando), before Judge Anne C. Conway. On May 20, 2025 she dismissed the emotional-distress claim but let the rest proceed, finding the court “not prepared to hold that Character A.I.'s output is speech” at that stage. The other settled cases: A.F. v. Character Technologies, No. 2:24-cv-01014 (E.D. Texas, two families), where Character.AI had moved to compel arbitration; Montoya v. Character Technologies, No. 1:25-cv-02907, and E.S. v. Character Technologies, No. 1:25-cv-02906 (D. Colorado); and P.J. v. Character Technologies, No. 1:25-cv-01295 (N.D. New York).
State cases: Kentucky's attorney general sued in Franklin Circuit Court in January 2026 under the state's consumer-protection and data-protection laws, seeking an injunction and damages. On May 5, 2026 Pennsylvania's Department of State announced a suit under the Medical Practice Act, alleging a chatbot claimed to be a licensed psychiatrist with an invalid license number; it seeks a preliminary injunction.
Status: Private Settlements, No Fund, New Suits Pending
Still open: the Kentucky and Pennsylvania suits, and A.D. v. Character Technologies, No. 3:26-cv-08400, filed August 13, 2026 in the Northern District of California for a Kentucky girl the complaint says was twelve, with no age check in her way. It is an individual damages suit, not a class action. A Virginia family suit filed December 19, 2025 was dismissed on April 13, 2026 for failure to serve the defendants.
Follow this case
There's no claim deadline yet. We'll email you if a settlement opens a claim period.
Who Can Bring a Claim
There is no class to join. Every family case so far is an individual lawsuit over a specific child, and the January 2026 settlements cover only the families who filed them.
In practice: a family that believes Character.AI harmed a child would need its own personal-injury lawyer. Filing deadlines differ by state, so speak with a licensed attorney early. Character.AI's U.S. minimum age is 13, according to the company as quoted in the August 2026 complaint, which alleges younger children can get around the age gate. The Kentucky and Pennsylvania cases are brought by the states; there is nothing for a family to join in them.
Is There Money? The Honest Answer
Character AI Lawsuit Timeline
- 1
October 22, 2024 — The First Family Suit
A Florida mother files Garcia v. Character Technologies in federal court in Orlando. It names Character Technologies, its two founders and Google as defendants.
- 2
May 20, 2025 — Most Claims Survive
Judge Anne C. Conway dismisses the emotional-distress claim, lets the rest proceed and declines, at that early stage, to treat the chatbot's output as protected speech.
- 3
September 2025 — FTC Inquiry, More Families Sue
On September 11 the FTC orders seven companies, including Character Technologies, to explain how they monitor chatbot effects on children and teens. Families in Colorado and New York file suits on September 15 and 16.
- 4
November 25, 2025 — Open-Ended Chat Ends for Minors
Character.AI's deadline for removing open-ended chat for users under 18, announced in late October together with new age-assurance checks.
- 5
January 2026 — Settlements in Principle; Kentucky Sues
Filings in Florida, Colorado and New York report settlements in principle, and the Florida case is dismissed on January 7. Kentucky's attorney general files a suit billed as the nation's first against an AI chatbot company.
- 6
May–September 2026 — New Suits, Still No Fund
Pennsylvania sues on May 5 and a new family suit is filed in California on August 13. As of September 30, the earlier settlements are still being finalized and no claim process exists.
Three Traps Specific to This Case
A widely reported case with private settlements and no claim form leaves room for people selling false hope:
“Claim your Character.AI settlement”
The January 2026 settlements were private deals with specific families. There is no fund, no administrator and no payment for other users. A site or ad asking for your details, your child's account or a fee to “release” a payment is not connected to any court.
Pay-to-join “class action” sign-ups
There is no Character AI class action to join; the family cases are individual suits. Be wary of anyone charging an upfront fee to “register” you, and do not upload your child's private chat history to a questionnaire site. Share it only with a lawyer you chose and checked with your state bar.
Bots posing as licensed professionals
Pennsylvania alleges a Character.AI chatbot said it was a licensed psychiatrist and gave an invalid license number. A Character is not a doctor or therapist, whatever it says. Check a real clinician's license with your state licensing board, and in a crisis call or text 988.
Character AI Lawsuit — Questions People Actually Ask
Is there a Character AI lawsuit settlement I can file a claim for?
No. The five family suits settled in principle in January 2026 were individual cases; the agreements are private and cover only those families. As of September 30, 2026 there is no class action, no settlement fund and no claim form.
What happened in Garcia v. Character Technologies?
A Florida mother sued in October 2024 after her teenage son's death, alleging Character.AI's design and marketing contributed to it. In May 2025 the judge let most claims proceed. On January 7, 2026 the parties told the court they had agreed to a mediated settlement in principle, and the court dismissed the case without prejudice the same day, keeping open a window for final settlement papers that it has since extended twice. The terms were not disclosed, and no court decided the allegations.
Why is Google named in the Character AI lawsuit?
Character.AI's founders previously worked at Google. The Garcia complaint alleges Google supplied cloud computing and, in August 2024, paid $2.7 billion for a non-exclusive license to Character.AI's technology and rehired both founders. Google argued it did not make or distribute the app. Google is a party to the Garcia settlement.
Are there new Character.AI lawsuits in 2026?
Yes. Kentucky's attorney general sued in January 2026 and Pennsylvania's Department of State on May 5, 2026. A new family suit, A.D. v. Character Technologies, No. 3:26-cv-08400, was filed in the Northern District of California on August 13, 2026. A Virginia family suit filed in December 2025 was dismissed in April 2026 for failure to serve the defendants.
What changed on Character.AI for users under 18?
Character.AI announced in late October 2025 that it would end open-ended chat for users under 18 by November 25, 2025, and began age-assurance checks using its own model and third-party tools such as Persona. It also offers an opt-in “Parental Insights” weekly report showing time spent and top Characters but not the conversations, according to the August 2026 complaint, which alleges the age checks can still fail.
My child used Character.AI and was harmed. What can I do now?
Safety first: if your child is struggling or in danger, call or text 988. Then preserve evidence before anything is deleted: screenshots of conversations, the account name and email, dates of use and any subscription charges. Check the account's age setting and whether Parental Insights is on. Individual claims go through a personal-injury lawyer; verify any lawyer with your state bar before sharing records.
What is the FTC doing about AI companion chatbots?
On September 11, 2025 the FTC issued 6(b) orders to seven companies — Alphabet, Character Technologies, Instagram, Meta, OpenAI, Snap and xAI — asking how they monitor effects on children and teens. A 6(b) study has no specific law-enforcement purpose and no claim process. Texas's attorney general also opened an investigation into Character.AI and Meta AI Studio in August 2025; see our Meta lawsuit page for the cases against Meta.
Is this the same as the ChatGPT or social media addiction lawsuits?
No. Those are separate cases against different companies, each with its own courts and status. See our ChatGPT lawsuit page for the cases against OpenAI and the social media addiction lawsuit page for the cases over teens' use of social platforms.
Separate from this case: were you injured in the last 2 years?
Class-action payouts are fixed amounts through an administrator. A personal injury claim is a different case — and often worth far more. Free estimate, no obligation.